(1) Has The JC got a policy with regard to the use of the terms "terrorism" and "terrorist" ?

(2) Why was The JC reluctant to describe al-Mabhouh as a "terrorist"?

(3) Is "militant" a more PC term than "terrorist" ?

(4) Was it morally unacceptable to kill a Hamas "terrorist"/ "militant" in Dubai?

(5) Are we now living in some PC-JC- make-believe world where "terrorists" actually no longer exist?

(6) Is Osama Bin Laden now an Islamic miltant?

Of course, Mr Pollard might believe that he is not duty bound to answer such questions. After all, je suis un mere blogger. But, I do think that readers de La Chronic Juive, would be intrigued by his answers.

If Mr Pollard reflects carefully on the matter, he might realize that the internet has closed the gap betweeen the editor and the readers. After all, on The JC's site, I am literally just a few centimetres away from him to The Right.

Mais to let le chat out of the bag (what le hell was le chat doing dans le bag??), methinks that there is un revolution brewing. Je pense that Le Roi Stephen du Chronic Juive est... Louis XIV. And smiling Miriam... "Let les bloggers mangent l'internet!"...elle est La Reigne Miriam Antoinette.

Le Roi Stephen, un ancien JC regime, can fall. Try et keep votre head.

Vive les Bloggers! Vive Les Bloggers!