Become a Member
Analysis

Trump's pick of a pro-settler envoy is about cronyism, not policy

The next administration’s foreign policy will be decided in Washington by the new president and his chief advisers, not his Israel ambassador

December 19, 2016 17:56
TRUMP CASINO BANKRUPTCY CASE
2 min read

Most US ambassadors around the world are classified as career Foreign Service Officers — in other words, State Department officials. The rest are designated “political appointees” and are handpicked by the president. Even among the latter, many, if not most, have some form of diplomatic or political experience relevant to their posting. A relatively small number are either personal friends or mega-donors, and these are usually posted to the more glamorous destinations like London, Rome and Paris. Tel Aviv, where the US embassy in Israel is currently situated, is less of an obvious posting for one of the president’s cronies.


It is not a given that David Friedman, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick as the next ambassador to Israel, will be confirmed in the position by Congress. If he is, however, he will not be the first Jewish ambassador, nor even the first Orthodox US ambassador to Israel — but he will be the first man sent by the American administration to this sensitive posting who has no relevant diplomatic experience whatsoever. 


On the other hand, no-one can accuse Mr Friedman of not being well-acquainted with the country where he is about to serve. On the contrary, the 57-year-old has visited Israel countless times, owns a flat in Jerusalem’s upscale Talbiyeh neighbourhood and has donated large sums to various Israeli institutions, particularly to those in Jewish settlements across the Green Line. He even appears to have facilitated a $10,000 donation from Mr Trump to the Beit El settlement in 2003, according to Yaakov Katz, one of town’s founders. 


Now that the horror — or the delight — over Mr Friedman’s appointment is beginning to subside, we can ask what it actually means, besides Mr Trump’s apparent propensity to dispense with diplomatic orthodoxies.