The Greens have said they want to twin Manchester with a Palestinian city in their manifesto for the city’s upcoming mayoral election.
In the document titled ‘Hope for Greater Manchester’, produced ahead of the July 30 poll that was triggered by the resignation of former mayor and now PM-in-waiting Andy Burnham, the party’s candidate Geraldine Coggins claims she wants to focus on “practical action” to help struggling Mancunians and not “flashy announcements”.
However, later on in the manifesto she says: “I will explore opportunities to twin Manchester with a city in Palestine, creating lasting partnerships between our communities and demonstrating our commitment to peace, justice and human dignity.”
Coggins goes on to say she will “call on Westminster to stop arming the genocide in Gaza and call for urgent international efforts to end the illegal occupation of Palestinian land”.
Elsewhere in the manifesto the Green mayoral hopeful says she plans to engage the Greater Manchester Pension Fund in order to “press for divestment from oil and gas and companies complicit in illegal aggression, war crimes or genocide”.
Section of the Greens' Manchester mayoral manifesto dealing with their candidate's position on Israel (Image: Green Party)[Missing Credit]
Guidance from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government prohibits councils from boycotting Israeli companies or those that trade with Israel. Companies are able to sue any council practising boycott, divestment and sanctions under procurement laws.
The Greens are third behind Labour and Reform UK in the first mayoral election poll.
However, they will hope they can repeat their success at the February by-election in Gorton and Denton – a constituency in Greater Manchester – when Hannah Spencer became their fifth MP.
The JC obtained a dossier of exchanges between Greens for Palestine and Jewish Greens revealing deeply concerning attitudes towards Jews within the party.
Many of the emails suggest Jews are being held responsible for the actions of Israel and other matters over which they have no responsibility. The exchanges took place within the context of a row over a proposed motion branding Zionism as racism.
To get more news, click here to sign up for our free daily newsletter.
