Israel

Analysis: This time, ignoring the council is right

July 29, 2010 10:43

By

Anshel Pfeffer,

Anshel Pfeffer

1 min read

A year-and-a-half ago, in the aftermath of Operation Cast Lead, the United Nations Human Rights Council announced that it was setting up a fact-finding commission to investigate claims of human rights abuse and war crimes.

The commission's chairman, one of the most respected members of the South African Jewish community and a committed Zionist, begged senior Israeli ministers to cooperate with him, but Prime Minister Ehud Olmert refused. The result was the damning Goldstone Report, which has continued to haunt Israel and especially the IDF for almost a year now.

While some insist that the report's unbalanced tone towards Israel is proof that there was no point in cooperating with it in the first place, many in Israel believe that Judge Goldstone could have been brought on side if he had been treated with the respect he so obviously thinks he deserves. The IDF has been forced to investigate every single allegation in the Goldstone Report and supply the UN with three comprehensive reports of its own anyway. Surely things would have been simpler if Judge Goldstone had been accommodated.

Does that mean that Israel is in for a similar beating with the latest UNHRC investigation over the Gaza flotilla? Not necessarily.

To get more Israel news, click here to sign up for our free Israel Briefing newsletter.

Support the world’s oldest Jewish newspaper