Become a Member
The Jewish Chronicle

Our burial grounds lack dignity

Cemeteries should be places of serenity, not bad taste

November 13, 2008 11:20

By

John Nathan,

John Nathan

3 min read

I am a snob. But I am the best kind of snob. I may wince at the pebble-dash on your house or the faux Doric columns on either side of your fake Tudor front door; and I may sniff at the chocolate-box art on your walls - that fading Renoir print in your hall or the kitsch souvenir relief of a happy Chasid on the landing. But I won't make a judgment about the content of your character based on the content of your house. Or worse, how big it is. Not like Arthur Miller's dying salesman, who reckons that people who are rich enough to have their own tennis court "must be fine people". Because that is the worst kind of snob.

It is not just the bad taste. It's the pretence I cannot stand. I want to know why anyone would want to make their suburban brick house look like it had been hewn from the desert rock by cladding it in stone. Do they pretend that they live on a ranch in New Mexico as opposed to a semi in New Malden?

Similar stuck-up thoughts flitted through my mind the other day as I stood at the pond in the United Synagogue's sprawling, flagship cemetery at Bushey.

Unlike Willesden's venerable burial ground, resting place of Anglo-Jewish grandees, its decaying Victoriana squeezed by a growing cityscape, Bushey is an isolated, vast car park of a graveyard - and not much of a place for the living. Nothing grows between the headstones. The clay ground is stony and sterile. And because the place opened for business as recently as 1947, the memorials are all relatively new, so no sense of history either.