The Tower Hamlets march was chilling as a more distilled version of the hate demonstrated on the national marches. Not just hate, but a programme and a cause: Islamist supremacy
October 27, 2025 12:34
You may have a seen a video that’s been doing the rounds on social media in the past couple of days from Tower Hamlets. A frightening mob of hundreds of men, all dressed in black, march through the streets, proclaiming the area as theirs and attacking (verbally) people who they say should not be there.
Given how close we are to the anniversary of the Battle of Cable Street, which took place in the same area on 4 October 1936, you might think from my description that it was some sort of Blackshirt tribute gathering. And in some senses it was, not least because there is only one real difference between the 1936 marchers and those on the 2025 march: this time round the fascists are Islamofascists.
This masked mob didn’t only proclaim the supremacy of their ideology, as the Mosleyites did; they also took over the streets outside the East London mosque for prayers. And tellingly, this weekend’s mob weren’t only wearing black clothes; they had their faces covered with black masks. As some of the marchers put it: “No face, no case.”
The march – the so-called Tower Hamlets Unity Demo - was ostensibly an “anti-racist” protest, which is doubtless why the slogans chanted included "Takbir”, “Allahu akbar", "Zionist scum, off our streets", “We will honour all our martyrs”, "With our souls and our blood, we will redeem you, oh al-Aqsa" (translated), "The Zionist government off our streets"and – as always - “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free". You get the gist. It is of course a golden rule of contemporary “anti-racist” protests that they must target Jews (I’m sorry, Zionists).
For two years we have had to grow used to the streets of London and other cities being taken over by hate marches. The arguments around these marches – both for and against – have been made so many times that you don’t need me to go over it all again. But this weekend’s march was different – and far more concerning in its implications even than the hate marches.
There are certainly many who go on the national marches who are genuinely there for humanitarian reasons. They are horrified by the results of Israel’s military action in Gaza and have no other agenda. Many of their fellow marchers, however, do have another agenda. They do not really care about Gaza. What they care about is Jews – and not in a good way. For these people, the humanitarian marchers alongside them are what Lenin famously described as useful idiots. Their naivety is exploited by those with a more hateful ideology.
Which brings us to the Tower Hamlets march. As always on such “anti-racist” protests, the Trot antifa crowd were there alongside the Islamists. I’ve seen no clearer illustration of the reality of the so-called "Red-Green” alliance between the left and Islamists than an exchange recorded on one of the clips circulating on social media. A masked marcher says something inaudible, to which a protestor with a “Refugees Welcome” placard replies: “There’s no need for that, we’re on the same side, bruv.”
The masked marcher responds, witheringly, “No we’re not”.
“Yes we are, bro”, pleads the antifa demonstrator, the very definition of the useful idiot – utterly clueless about the reality of the ideology with which they are allying, and about what would befall him and his fellow leftists should the Islamists achieve their aim. They’re like the “Queers for Palestine” you see on the hate marches – fools who can’t comprehend that were they in rather than merely for Palestine they wouldn’t last long before the Islamists executed them.
The Tower Hamlets march was chilling as a more distilled version of the hate demonstrated on the national marches. Not just hate, but a programme and a cause: Islamist supremacy. The message was clear about Tower Hamlets: This is ours. We control the streets. We control the area. We control the people.
But the threat is far broader than Tower Hamlets. The last election showed how potent the Muslim sectarian vote can be, returning four MPs. That vote and that potency is only going to grow. The issue is not that a wave of sectarian Muslim MPs are about to sweep into power, but more insidious; that in their fear of rejection by these voters, Labour (and, as they have shown in a more limited way so far, Lib Dem) politicians will do what politicians always do: tack to where the votes are. Labour’s move to treat Israel no longer as an ally but an enemy, backing arrest warrants, sanctions, and recognition of Palestine is part of this process.
But the Islamist agenda is far wider than Israel and the Jews, and the scenes in Tower Hamlets show how threatening, confident and well supported the Islamists now are. There is a radicalism that is not merely unafraid to show itself but which exults in its strength.
The warning signs have been there for years, and as a society we have done next to nothing about any of it beyond a focus (understandable and correct) on the terror threat. But that is the extreme end of the Islamist spectrum. The radical Islamism on display in Tower Hamlets is a demonstration of that failure. And we are nowhere near even accepting the scale of its threat, let alone understanding how to tackle it.
To get more from opinion, click here to sign up for our free Editor's Picks newsletter.
