Become a Member
Leaders

US backing and Israeli force secured the Gaza deal

The agreement could pave the way for wider regional peace, made possible by Trump’s backing and Israeli resolve – in contrast to Europe’s failed bid to pressure the victim into concessions

October 9, 2025 08:21
leader.jpg
Israelis celebrate the Gaza deal at Hostage Square in Tel Aviv on October 9, 2025. (Image: Getty)
2 min read

Two years after the October 7 massacres, the war may at last be drawing to a close. If the terms President Trump announced last night hold, the hostages will be freed on Simchat Torah, the very festival when the Hamas invasion began. That coincidence will not erase the horror of that day; nothing ever can. But it may allow the anniversary, forever marked by grief, also to carry another memory: of deliverance, of life reclaimed, and of a nation enduring.

For Jews in Britain, too, it would be a moment of vindication: a community that stood united with Israel and refused to let the plight of the hostages be forgotten.

This breakthrough came about because US President Trump stood by Israel, backing its military action against Hamas without which no deal that genuinely promised peace could ever have been achieved: one that demands the immediate release of all hostages, Hamas’s disarmament, and Israel’s security presence in Gaza for the foreseeable future. And although it may never be reported as such, it is plain that Washington also pressured Hamas’s backers, Qatar and Turkey, forcing them in turn to lean on the Islamist terrorists. We may never know the full story, but it seems more than likely that Israel’s failed attempt to assassinate Hamas’s leadership in Doha nonetheless succeeded in sending an unmistakable message: Qatar’s days of playing both arsonist and firefighter were finished. It now had to choose to put out the flames.

Trump’s morally and strategically sound policy stands in stark contrast to that of Europe and the UK, which abandoned Israel, isolated and vilified it, pressing the victim to surrender to the very terrorists who had attacked it. Many Western governments were less interested in confronting terror abroad than in appeasing radicals at home.

To get more from opinion, click here to sign up for our free Editor's Picks newsletter.