The CST complained to the Vice-Chancellor, Prof Hugh Brady, both on its own behalf and that of others libelled by Prof Miller — and, perhaps most pertinently, on behalf of specific Jewish students who found the lecture profoundly disturbing.
One would have expected any institution to take such concerns seriously. Instead, Bristol’s response was in effect to tell its Jewish students, and those who represent them, to shut up.
When John Mann MP intervened, he was told that that Bristol “does not intend to respond further to the complaint from CST”.
Bristol’s behaviour, and that of its Vice-Chancellor, falls so far below the most basic duty of care that it owes its students that one must conclude that Prof Brady neither cares what happens to current Jewish students nor whether any more enroll at Bristol University.
