Become a Member
Stephen Pollard

By

Stephen Pollard,

Stephen Pollard

Opinion

Carole Cadwalladr: Norman Lamont was the only qualified Chancellor (er, I think that's what she's saying)

May 17, 2010 07:43
1 min read

There's a good piece to be written on the absence of women in government. But Carole Cadwalladr's ridiculous piece in the Obsever isn't it.

Ms Cadwalladr's argument rests on her dislike - and that appears to be putting it mildly - of George Osborne:

Why are there so few female politicians? Why do so few women bother
to claw their way to the top? I mean who wouldn't want this? The
"reason" there are few women in this cabinet, we are told, just four
out of a total of 29, is because there aren't any women to choose from.
And the ones there are, just aren't up to the job. They're
insufficiently talented, they don't have the experience.

It's why Theresa May was a "surprise" appointment. Or as the Telegraph
put it: "She strikes the only clunky note so far." Which is hilarious
when you consider that this is a cabinet that contains George Osborne.
Because this is as opportune a moment as any to run through George
Osborne's economic experience in full: he doesn't have any. And to
enumerate the number of jobs he's had in business/the City/finance:
none. And his relevant educational qualifications? Zero.

To get more from opinion, click here to sign up for our free Editor's Picks newsletter.