Become a Member
Anshel Pfeffer

By

Anshel Pfeffer,

Anshel Pfeffer

Analysis

Syrian ceasefire is meaningless

September 15, 2016 10:31
A burning building after an Assad regime attack on Idlib during the cease fire
2 min read

Another weekend marathon of talks between US State Secretary John Kerry and Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov yielded yet another Syrian ceasefire agreement - or, as it's called nowadays, a "cessation of hostilities". The CoH began on Monday evening and was immediately broken half a dozen times in a couple of hours by the Syrian government and its allies. Of course, many ceasefires are initially shaky before stabilising but there seems little hope of this truce being any more successful than that brokered in February which broke down completely in a matter of weeks.

It did not inspire confidence that neither Mr Kerry nor his chief spokesperson could seem to get their versions straight on whether the agreement would allow the Assad regime to attack Daesh and Al Qaeda-linked groups, with US and Russian coordination and even the White House officially stating that "we have some reasons to be skeptical that the Russians are able or are willing to implement the arrangement". The various rebel groups certainly did not feel that the CoH was a fair deal, and uniformly rejected it.

Whatever the prospects of the US-Russia agreement, and they certainly seem poor, the fact that the Americans were even prepared to accept such a vague deal only emphasises the extent to which the Obama administration has given up on effecting any change in the Syrian war, where the death toll is steadily creeping to half a million.

The US, along with most of the rest of the western nations, seems to have accepted that Bashar Assad is not budging and are focusing solely on the slow war of attrition against Daesh.

To get more from opinion, click here to sign up for our free Editor's Picks newsletter.