Become a Member
Anonymous

By

Anonymous,

Anonymous

Analysis

Romney or Obama, which President is good news for Israel?

Jonathan Cummings says that Romney is not the blessing many may think, while Robin Shepherd argues a vacillating Obama is due a bloody nose.

October 14, 2012 10:00
Romney and Obama
2 min read

Jonathan Cummings

Would President Mitt Romney be good news for Israel?

His supporters certainly think so. They envisage the return of an unapologetic approach to the Middle East, a refreshing change from President Barack Obama’s misjudged embrace of the Arab Spring. They also cast him as a friend of Israel, a no-brainer when support for Israel hovers somewhere between half and two-thirds of all Americans.

Early on in the campaign, Mr Romney struck a chord when he accused the president of “throwing Israel under the bus”. Mr Romney shares Israeli (and Palestinian) pessimism about the chances of restarting the peace process. He is demonstrably comfortable with Bibi Netanyahu, and Sheldon Adelson is comfortable with both of them, to the tune of $150m. Israelis like Mr Romney, or at least prefer him by a large margin over Mr Obama. However, it may be more style than substance that distinguishes Mr Romney from Mr Obama when it comes to specific Middle East policies. Both are resolved to prevent a nuclear Iran but neither will endorse unilateral Israeli action. Both seek regime change in Syria, but neither will deploy US troops to achieve it. Both are concerned that the current Israel-Palestinian calm is fragile, but neither will exert sufficient pressure on the sides for negotiations to resume.

To get more from opinion, click here to sign up for our free Editor's Picks newsletter.