Philip Goldenberg and Robert Stone can return to the Board next month after making a ‘suitable apology’
November 27, 2025 15:47
The Board of Deputies is to reinstate two of the five members who were suspended over their role in a letter published in the Financial Times earlier this year, which was highly critical of the Israeli government’s actions in Gaza.
Philip Goldenberg, who represents North West Surrey Reform Synagogue, and Robert Stone, of Finchley Reform Synagogue, will be able to resume their seats next month.
The Board’s executive committee informed members that two deputies have had their suspensions reduced after the receipt of a “suitable apology” from them.
All 36 signatories of the letter, which appeared in April, were formally reprimanded in June for breach of the Board’s code of conduct following a disciplinary process which found they had misrepresented their personal views as those of the Board.
Philip Goldenberg (Courtesy)[Missing Credit]
Five of the 36 received more severe sanctions on the grounds that they had helped to promote the letter. They were initially barred from the Board for two years, but three were given the option of having their suspension reduced to six months if they made an apology.
Subsequently, the full suspensions for four of the five were reduced on appeal from two years to 18 months.
The letter, which claimed that Israel’s soul was “being ripped out”, ignited controversy within the community with some Orthodox synagogues threatening to quit the Board if the authors were not sanctioned. But Progressive rabbis rallied to the defence of the signatories, saying they had been “principled and brave” and criticising the suspensions as “disproportionate”.
Goldenberg said this week: “I am glad the process has now been completed. It has revealed many procedural flaws and the Board should learn lessons from these flaws.”
He and Stone, who are both members of the Board’s finance, fundraising, and organisation division, will be able to return from December 24
The Board’s appeal panel had found an “inadvertent error” in the original investigation of the complaints against the signatories but agreed that the code of conduct had been breached.
To get more news, click here to sign up for our free daily newsletter.