closeicon
News

Oxford students renew furious campaign against top Jewish barrister over role in gay marriage case

The university’s LGBTQ+ society now says Dinah Rose should give up her legal fees

articlemain

Oxford students have renewed their furious campaign against Magdalen College’s president, Dinah Rose QC, for representing the Cayman Islands in their legal battle to uphold a ban on gay marriage.

The university’s LGBTQ+ society, which has claimed that the top Jewish barrister’s work representing the Caribbean British overseas territory was a “stain” on the college,  has now urged her to donate her fees to charity.

The Cayman authorities are fighting a challenge brought by a British woman and her partner, who argue that their ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional.

Ms Rose represented the Cayman Islands in a hearing at the Privy Council in London earlier this year. 

The Privy Council has yet to announce its decision – over whether same-sex couples already have the legal right to marry in Cayman Islands or, as its government argues, this should be a matter for its parliament to agree.  

The Cayman Islands approved civil partnerships for same-sex couples last year. 

In a statement posted on Facebook, Oxford’s LGBTQ+ society said it was “shocked and disappointed” to learn the amount she was being paid for the case. 

“Ms. Rose is already receiving a substantial salary for her primary role as president and so we implore her to donate her fee to LGBTQ+ advocacy organisations and charities in the Cayman Islands who are working tirelessly to support vulnerable LGBTQ+ people in the area,” the society said. 

It also claimed there was a conflict between her role in the legal case and “her primary and overriding responsibility to protect the LGBTQ+ members of Magdalen”. 

According to The Times, it emerged that she was paid £134,000 for her work after a freedom of information request by an LGBT advocacy group in the Caribbean and the OULGBTQ+ Society. 

Ms Rose, who became president of Magdalen a year ago, told the student newspaper Cherwell that the OULGBTQ+ Society’s presentation of her fee had been “inaccurate and misleading” since it related to her work over a two-year period; a “substantial majority” of the fee had been paid to her before she had become president of the college. 

In a statement earlier this year, she said, “The allegation that my participation in this case conflicts with my role as president of Magdalen College is based on the very identification of a lawyer with their client’s cause which international human rights law prohibits.  

“A barrister’s personal opinions or values cannot be inferred from their representation of a particular party.” 

She added that “as it happens, I have argued a number of cases that have advanced LGBTQ+ rights, including some pioneering trans rights cases in the 1990s, and a recent case in the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal, which won for gay couples the right to immigration visas on the same terms as mixed sex couples.” 

Share via

Want more from the JC?

To continue reading, we just need a few details...

Want more from
the JC?

To continue reading, we just
need a few details...

Get the best news and views from across the Jewish world Get subscriber-only offers from our partners Subscribe to get access to our e-paper and archive