Mr Harrington, 62, was accused of evasiveness during the court case, over questions about whether the Metropolitan line extension would affect the value of land in which he had an interest.
After being asked about it for a third time, Mr Harrington conceded he would be "likely to benefit".
Following the hearing, Mr Harrington claimed that "all my disclosures to the court were full and frank to the very best of my knowledge."
Mr Harrington – who is Jewish and was raised in Leeds – married Jessie in 1982, and they separated in 2013.
His wife had originally asked for 53 per cent of his assets, though the judge ruled that the split should be half each. Following the publication of the judgement, Mr Harrington said he "believed it right that our assets should be split 50-50.
"This was what I offered at the outset. After two years of considerable and unnecessary expense, this was exactly what the judge ruled."
