Child sex abuser David Glausiusz fails in legal challenge against convictions

On Tuesday, Glausiusz launched appeals against his sex offence convictions, claiming a series of mistakes during his trial meant the jury's guilty verdicts were "unsafe".

The trial judge had not properly warned the jury about how to consider some of the evidence, his lawyers claimed.

Potentially critical evidence had also been included in the trial in order to "bolster an inherently weak" case against him, they said.

It consisted of images of naked teenage women which were found on his laptop and which his lawyers claimed had prejudiced the jury against him.

There was also "fresh evidence" from a new witness which suggested that one of Glausiusz's victims had admitted he was lying, it was claimed.

After a 90-minute hearing at the Court of Appeal in London on Tuesday, appeal judge Mr Justice Holgate rejected Glausiusz's case.

"Overall, there is no arguable basis for contending that any of the convictions were unsafe," he said. "Therefore, the renewed application for leave to appeal is refused."