Become a Member
Life

Wuthering Heights review: ‘This sex-heavy new interpretation never feels as daring as the old’

Emerald Fennell’s take on the classic literary love story is sure to leave film audiences as unsatisfied as diehard Brontë fans

February 25, 2026 15:04
WW3_Courtesy of Warner Bros.jpg
1 min read

Director Emerald Fennell’s high design take of English literature’s greatest gothic love story goes too far in one way and not far enough in another.

That is to say in this latest of many a screen adaptation of Emily Brontë’s novel in which the obsessive relationship at its core is famously unconsummated, there is enough bonking going on to make the casual observer think he was watching one of those period parodies of the kind that made Flesh (not Flash) Gordon in the 1970s.

True, there is the first two thirds of the film during which Jacob Elordi’s Heathcliff and Margot Robbie’s Cathy sail through childhood and puberty – he was adopted, she was neglected – without hormones getting in the way too much. But after Cathy escapes the stone cold country pile of Wuthering Heights and also the misrule of her alcoholic father (a superbly disgusting Martin Clunes who may find this film heralds a Richard E. Grant-like boost to his film career), she and Heathcliff have a whole montage devoted to having sex in every possible location - and position. They do it in her bedroom, on the moor, in a carriage, at Wuthering Heights – where of course they bonded as children – and all the way back again.

All this replaces not so much what you would call abstinence in the book, more absence. Placing quotation marks around the title is presumably meant to allow such licence. Yet if Fennell’s intention was to liberate the film from being shackled to the original, the point is lost as the new version never feels as daring as the old.

To get more from Life, click here to sign up for our free Life newsletter.

Topics:

Film

review