Become a Member
Life

Taut, urgent and elegant - this is why we long for the short story

As a short-story writer, I am often asked by friends and family: ''So, when are you going to write a novel?"

June 12, 2015 17:31
Passion: Rebecca Swirsky believes in the power of small (Photo: Graham Shakleton)

By

Anonymous,

Anonymous

3 min read

As a short-story writer, I am often asked by friends and family: ''So, when are you going to write a novel?" A literary urban myth persists that a collection of short stories is easier to write and less substantial to read than a novel, as if fewer words mean less work for the writer and less reward for the reader. Yet the opposite is true: every word counts in a short story. Consider the most extreme example of a short story, six words penned by Ernest Hemingway: ''For sale, babies shoes, never worn.''

Well-constructed stories, doing more with less, are like acrobats in a box, performing tricks in tiny spaces, a fact that will be highlighted at next week's London Short Story Festival. The condensed word count allows for elegance, tautness and urgency, as readers become aware of an imminent end. Any overstatement, inaccuracy or flagging moment - so easily ignored while reading a long novel - can kill a short story's delicate form.

Vanessa Gebbie, critically acclaimed for her novel The Coward's Tale as well as the short-story collection Words from a Glass Bubble, and Short Circuit: A Guide to the Art of the Short Story, reveres both forms. ''I'm often asked whether the short story is a good grounding for the novel, as if somehow, the longer form is superior to the shorter, or a natural progression,'' she says. ''Having written both, I can say the story and the novel are such different beasts. When a reader says, 'Short stories are always disappointing, as you just get into one and it finishes,' I want to say, 'Read for the pleasure of the words and what they reveal. You have to gift a short story your time and it will gift you itself.'"

Short stories, then, are something of a paradox - they can be quicker to read but they demand more time to delight in and decipher, as their richness and complexities become clear. Take Vladimir Nabokov's story Symbols and Signs, published in the New Yorker in 1948, that focuses on an elderly couple's attempt to visit their son in a sanitarium. The son suffers from a malady of reading symbols into life, yet the story's title is a cue to ''read'' for signs embedded in the text. In a letter to Katharine A. White, The New Yorker's fiction editor at the time, Nabokov described this style as one in which "a second (main) story is woven into, or placed behind, the superficial semi-transparent one." The surface story might be straightforward, but seeping through is a bigger, secondary story regarding vulnerability and the unknowability of life.

To get more from Life, click here to sign up for our free Life newsletter.

Editor’s picks