Become a Member
Books

The joys - and the oys! - of judging the Wingate

Choosing a winner was excruciating, says the chair of judges, ahead of Monday's announcement of this year's top Jewish book

February 21, 2019 10:13
Rabbi Boyd Gelfand

For a bibliophile, the invitation to chair the JQ Wingate Prize was like winning the lottery. Nothing makes me quite so happy as a stack of unread books on my nightstand. Suddenly, I had dozens, with more arriving on my doorstep every day. How on earth was I to sift through all of them and produce even a long list, much less a winner?

Thankfully, I had three other judges to share the journey with me, working collectively to whittle the numerous boxes of books down to a long list, then a short list and eventually to our winner.

Sadly, some of my favourites didn’t meet the necessary criteria – literary merit; substantive Jewish content of interest to the general reader; easily available in the UK. For example, Fascism by Madeleine Albright and Brit(ish) by Afua Hirsch were both brilliant. I imagine their publishers submitted them because the author was of Jewish heritage. But while both books have clear implications for Jews and other minorities, neither had a distinctive Jewish message. So, to my regret, they were unable to move on through the process (although they both now have prominent places on my personal bookshelf and I highly recommend them)

In coming up with our long list, the real challenge from my perspective was that our contenders spanned multiple genres. Unlike most literary prizes, JQ Wingate can be awarded to either fiction or non-fiction, which means we were comparing Israeli journalist Yossi Klein Halevi’s Letters to My Palestinian Neighbour to British writer Deborah Levy’s autobiographical The Cost of Living to American novelist Dara Horn’s fanciful historical fiction Eternal Life. In my opinion, each merited a prize for its own genre.