Become a Member
The Jewish Chronicle

John Hagee: Analysis

May 29, 2008 23:00

By

Anonymous,

Anonymous

2 min read

John Hagee will not be speaking next week at the annual conference of Aipac, the pro-Israel Jewish lobby. He did last year — and the decision to invite him was controversial, but not as controversial as it would have been today. Pastor Hagee of San Antonio, the most visible Evangelical Christian supporter of Israel, is losing credibility by the day.

Last month he was attacked, personally, by Rabbi Eric Yoffie, head of the Reform movement. He was also attacked by political rivals of Republican John McCain for comments he made that were seen as derogatory towards Catholics. Last week, Mr McCain dumped him off his political wagon for comments he made regarding the historic role of Adolf Hitler. The man who has been working day and night on behalf of Israel was suddenly seen by some as antisemitic. “My life’s work”, he said, was “mischaracterised and attacked”. 

Mr Hagee’s uneasy relations with American Jews were an accident waiting to happen. They never felt comfortable with his support for Israel, never really accepted him as part of the “camp”. We cannot cooperate with the Christian Zionists, said Rabbi Yoffie, because theirs is not “unconditional support for the Jewish state”, but rather support for a certain political agenda — one that is unacceptable to Rabbi Yoffie.

Mr Hagee, no doubt, hold views that tend to be on the hawkish side, but denies allegations that he only supports Israel if Israel follows his beliefs. “I will never abandon Israel,” he said many times in the past — and this assertion will now face the ultimate challenge, as Mr Hagee is probably hurt, and angry, and disappointed, maybe disillusioned. “Do we really want to treat our friends like this?” asks David Brog, the Jewish Executive Director of Christians United for Israel, which Hagee founded. Mr Hagee suspects, with good reason, that the uneasiness of many American Jews with his pro-Israel activities has more to do with domestic concerns — their rejection of his views on matters of church-state relations — than with his Israel-related activities.