Become a Member

By

Michael Sophocles

Opinion

Waissel escapes being voted off by design or by accident?

November 1, 2010 11:03
2 min read

The X FACTOR unlike the Apprentice seems to revel in making incorrect decisions when it comes to choosing who will be departing the show. This naturally leads to controversy that in turn leads to fierce debate, which concludes finally in viewing figures soaring.

This point is of great interest to me. The Apprentice does offer a certain kind of rough justice when it comes to the boardroom. However I always find that if you pay close attention throughout the task and examine the behaviour of the losing team in the boardroom, the correct decision is made perhaps nine times out of ten.

The Apprentice of course is not a popularity contest and the public are not privy to any sort of decision-making. The show prides itself on being about displaying the finest business talent on show and watching how this supposed ability can handle extreme pressure.

The winner of the Apprentice is the one that can endure stress for the longest. Public opinion aside, The X Factor follows the same basic formula. The contestants are there for their singing/performing ability foremost. (At least this is what we are told) They then must withstand the pressure that is mounted on them by sensationalist press campaigns and the constant marketing of themselves as mainstream pop stars for the masses. (Even if that branding jars with their natural disposition.)

To get more from opinion, click here to sign up for our free Editor's Picks newsletter.