Become a Member

By

Emma Kane

Opinion

To compete, the arts need to collaborate

November 27, 2014 12:27
The Barbican will see a new production of 'Hamlet' next summer starring Benedict Cumberbatch
3 min read

Competition can be bad for business and charities - if the focus becomes "beating" others, the losers can be the intended beneficiaries. When organisations wake up to the power of collaboration, it can give access to new markets, facilitate more ambitious projects, and prevent wastage from duplication in areas such as administration and leadership. Competition is not always bad, but even more can often be achieved through collaboration or consolidation.

As the new chairman of the Barbican Centre Trust, I am experiencing this at first hand. The Barbican, in the City of London, is at the centre of a hub of leading cultural organisations enjoyed by millions of people every year; it includes the Guildhall School of Music & Drama, the London Symphony Orchestra, and the Museum of London. What I find fascinating is the way they are increasingly working together not only to enhance the cultural experience but to maximise the return on funds raised. The power of this combined group, as a cultural hub, has been recognised and is being actively supported by the City of London Corporation; it will also be enhanced when it finds itself at the heart of Crossrail in 2018.

So why is this relevant to those outside the City, particularly in the wake of the merger talks between the JW3 arts organisation and the London Jewish Cultural Centre? In my opinion, there are three key reasons why charities and arts groups would benefit significantly from collaboration and why this is something that their trustees should be focusing on.

Firstly, reducing administrative costs - the Barbican collaborates with the Guildhall School of Music and Drama, sharing a chief operating and financial officer and an HR department.