Become a Member

By

Graham Morrison

Opinion

The travel is said to be better than the arriving – I’m unconvinced

August 8, 2008 14:54
2 min read

Beijing is my fourth Olympics and it hardly seems four years since I was in Athens for 2004 Games. That might be because the process of getting here has been so time consuming. The accreditation process takes two years and all categories of accreditation are oversubscribed.

The forms go back with supporting evidence and six months on you get an answer. My accreditation type is ‘E' meaning written press for all competition venues. Then there is a timetable for booking a hotel via the organisers, and a flight. Paying for the hotel was an adventure in itself. I had to turn up at the Bank of China in Cannon Street with the cash. And after more form-filling, my precious piece of plastic arrived... an all-in-one accreditation and entry visa. I'd better not lose it!

The flight to Beijing would have been fine had it not been for the typhoon, which caused cancellations from Hong Kong and a seven-hour delay for the connecting flight. Hong Kong International airport might be efficient and state-of-the-art ultimately a departure lounge is a departure lounge. At least my baggage arrived with me. Checked into the hotel at 3.30am and and slept through breakfast.

Beijing is hot and humid: 28 - 30C during the day with 60 - 75% humidity. At night it is cooler, but not that much. Earlier in the week the skies were blue I'm told. But since I arrived there have been grey skies and reduced visibility. In a newsletter I saw yesterday, the IOC was congratulating the city for the major progress in tackling air pollution. At least the IOC is working with Beijing on the subject and the world's pollution scientists are said to see the work here as having ‘much larger ramifications beyond the Games' which maybe is code for even higher taxes for family cars and people carriers in London.

To get more from opinion, click here to sign up for our free Editor's Picks newsletter.