Become a Member
Opinion

Same old Middle East debate? Maybe not

That the government itself sought a debate on Israel and the Palestinians may be an indication of Tory intentions to take the matter seriously over the next year or two.

July 14, 2017 08:15
Emily Thornberry landed a number of blows on the Tories (Photo: PA)
2 min read

An early indication of how this Parliament might pan out on the discussion of Israel-Palestinian relations came with the debate in the Commons last week.

There were numerous copy-and-paste questions from MPs about settlement building, Balfour and funding for the Palestinian Authority, which, admirable as they may have been, could have been plucked from any such debate in recent years and added little. But I spotted a few more notable points during the three-hour session.

The dozens of references to Donald Trump make clear that until or unless the US President reveals his true position, British politicians will be in limbo. There is only one true one power-player who can affect things on the ground in Jerusalem and Ramallah, and he is yet to properly engage.

The elections of Conservatives Paul Masterton — in East Renfrewshire — and 29-year-old Ross Thomson means that the past two years of SNP-dominated views on Israel from Scotland will, at least, be tempered. For that, Scottish Jews will be grateful. Both MPs made positive contributions, with Mr Thomson raising the “tremendous synergies” between Aberdeen, the city he represents in Westminster, and Tel Aviv — not necessarily a link that has been made before.

To get more from opinion, click here to sign up for our free Editor's Picks newsletter.

Editor’s picks