Left-wingers have rallied round to support Graham Platner and dismiss concern about his Totenkopf tattoo
November 3, 2025 11:23
Right-wing nods to Nazism are evil and disqualifying, but left-wing nods to Nazism are understandable or inconsequential. That may sound nonsensical, but it’s the crux of American progressives’ position on Graham Platner. Platner is Maine’s 41-year-old progressive US Senate candidate, whom the left-wing Atlantic dubbed “a one-man Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact”.
Platner had been toughing out recent revelations about internet comments he has made. In 2013 he blamed sexual assault victims for being inebriated. From 2016 to 2021, he denigrated the LGBTQ community. He self-identified as an “antifa supersoldier” and labelled white, rural Americans “racist and stupid” in 2020. In 2021, he called himself a “communist” and cops “bastards”. Platner has been distancing himself from such comments, but his biggest reputational challenge remains his Totenkopf chest tattoo.
The Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA) explains the Totenkopf as “a Nazi-era skull-and-crossbones design favoured by SS officers. Totenkopf, or Death’s Head, was also the name of the division of officers who guarded the concentration camps.” Platner claims he chose the tattoo on a drunken marines’ outing in Croatia in 2007, and nobody ever called him a Nazi.
That argument is being publicly contested. Jewish Insider cited a former acquaintance recalling Platner called it “‘my Totenkopf’… in a cutesy little way” in 2012. CNN then reported “Platner had described [his tattoo] as a Nazi-style design” to this acquaintance who texted about it “several months ago, before the story became public”.
There’s also Genevieve McDonald, Platner’s former political director, who recently resigned without accepting $15,000 to sign a non-disclosure agreement. McDonald posted on Facebook: “Graham has an antisemitic tattoo on his chest. He’s not an idiot, he’s a military history buff. Maybe he didn’t know it when he got it, but he got it years ago and he should have had it covered up because he damn well knows what it means.”
Context is instructive. Before this, Platner fundraised by attacking Israel and pro-Israel organisation Aipac, the bogeyman of American politics. September started with Jewish Insider reporting Platner had eight ads “running on Facebook and Instagram”. All eight repudiated Aipac, “and around half accuse[d] Israel of genocide”. Ads featured language like “‘there is a genocide happening in Palestine’, ‘why are we funding Netanyahu’s genocide in Palestine?’ and ‘I won’t kowtow to Aipac or billionaires’.”
Zach Schwartz, director of Maine’s Jewish Community Relations Council, told JTA: “Platner’s repeated, singular focus on not taking money from Aipac plays into familiar, harmful tropes that Jews or organisations like Aipac control the government.” In practice, Platner echoing myths that endanger Jews is more salient than his calling himself “a lifelong opponent” of antisemitism or Nazism.
Democrats in Washington have remained highly supportive, though. Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin characterised Platner’s online posts as “hurtful” and “offensive,” not “disqualifying”. Vermont senator Bernie Sanders, the Squad’s Jewish godfather, was vexed when asked about what he dismissively deemed “a tattoo”. New Mexico senator Martin Heinrich said: “Graham has made a lot of mistakes in his life. He’s had a very long journey to the place where he is today, but he’s owned those mistakes, owned up to them, and he’s evolved.” Connecticut senator Chris Murphy said Platner “sounds like a human being to me – a human being who made mistakes, recognises them, and is very open about it”. And representative Ro Khanna “abhor[s]” Platner’s online comments, but said, “we have to extend people grace for the culture that they’re part of”.
On Sunday, Massachusetts representative Jake Auchincloss became the first Congressional Democrat to urge Platner to drop out. Two Jewish state legislators also weighed in. California state senator Ben Allen messaged, “With all of this guy’s messiness, I’m supporting the Governor [Janet Mills].” Platner isn’t the only option in next year’s Democratic primary, so progressives’ wagon-circling is striking. Meanwhile, Georgia state representative Esther Panitch messaged: “If you were upset about Elon [Musk]’s arm gesture but are excusing Platner’s Nazi tattoo, you are nothing but a partisan hack.” Panitch is right; partisans’ standards should apply to everyone, including themselves.
For all the talk about Platner’s supposed evolution, his hyper-focus on Aipac and Israel happened this year. Progressives untroubled by politics organised against Jews will downplay such developments, but they’re bad for society. Furthermore, the bipartisan, post-war taboo against Nazism was salutary. It shouldn’t be smashed, nor should there be carve-outs for anyone, anti-Israel progressives included.
To get more from opinion, click here to sign up for our free Editor's Picks newsletter.
