Become a Member
Letters

The JC Letters Page, 25th January 2019

Martin Rankoff, Philip Levy, Eileen Hauptman, David Levenson, J Kornberg, Barbara Sherling and Anthony Rudolf share their views with JC readers

January 24, 2019 09:55
Letters.PNG
6 min read

History shows that land for peace doesn’t work

Ami Ayalon and co write (Why UK must not copy Trump embassy move, January 18): “Israel will be able to preserve its Jewish and democratic identity only if a Palestinian state is established alongside it”.


They don’t say how Israel, withdrawn to a width of nine miles at its most densely populated region, overlooked by the Judean hills, could be defended, given that its main arteries and sole international airport would be easy targets for terrorists, who would disrupt normal life in Israel. The Palestinians constitute part of the Arab nation, as they often remind us, and there are currently 22 sovereign Arab states and just one tiny Jewish state, so the “two states for two peoples” formula has been well satisfied on the Palestinian side.


The idea of giving over Jerusalem’s Arab neighbourhoods to a future Palestinian state is madness, given that all the Jewish holy places are in East Jerusalem, which was cleansed of all its Jews after 3,000 years continuous presence, when the Jordanians invaded and occupied it in 1948. West Jerusalem has no significance in Jewish history.


Israelis have learnt the hard way that giving up territory “for peace”, as in Gaza and South Lebanon, brings war instead.