Become a Member
Opinion

Lanzmann’s Shoah was so well done many find it near-impossible to watch

Claude Lanzmann’s epic reshaped how the Holocaust is remembered. He built his film not on archives but on silence – the terrible absence left by the dead

November 20, 2025 15:08
MV5BMzUzYTE4NjgtODhkYS00OTMxLWJlMWEtN2M5MzI3NjViYjUzXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_FMjpg_UX1920_
Henrik Gawkowski, who drove trains carrying Jews to Treblinka, in Shoah (Why Not Productions)
4 min read

In his memoir The Patagonian Hare, Claude Lanzmann tells a story about Shoah, his nine-and-a-half-hour documentary about the Holocaust, which is 40 this year. After it was released, Lanzmann, a Frenchman, was invited to dinner with Jean-Marie Lustiger, a Jew who converted to Catholicism and became Cardinal Archbishop of Paris. The drawing room of the archbishop’s palace was “littered with videos of Shoah, a chaos that betrayed both the viewer’s urgency and his inability to make sense of the film”.

Eventually, the archbishop entered. “I’ve watched it, you see? I’ve watched it!” he repeated over and over, extremely agitated. Lanzmann mentioned to Lustiger the scene in the documentary at Chelmo church, in which the organist called the murder of the Jews “God’s will”.

“He [Lustiger] didn’t know what I was talking about.” Lanzmann realised that, “despite the videos scattered around the drawing room on the first floor, he [Lustiger] had not seen Shoah at all”, and confessed: “I can’t do it, I just can’t, I’ve managed to watch about a minute of it a day. Please forgive me…”

So Lustiger, Cardinal Archbishop of Paris, born a Jew, did not watch Shoah. He could not.

To get more from opinion, click here to sign up for our free Editor's Picks newsletter.