Become a Member
Opinion

Highlighting the voices of survivors

There is still much to learn from Holocaust survivors, says Dr Christine Schmidt

March 23, 2021 11:33
GettyImages-634389144.jpg
Britain's Prince Charles, Prince of Wales (L), who is Patron of The Holocaust Memorial Day Trust, is pictured with Auschwitz survivor Susan Pollack during a recption at St. James' Palace in London on February 9, 2017. / AFP / POOL / Justin TALLIS (Photo credit should read JUSTIN TALLIS/AFP via Getty Images)
4 min read


“We were without a voice, in the bitter cold, on a long, long walk. That was a death march.” Susan Pollack, a Hungarian Jewish woman who survived the Holocaust at the age of 14, spoke these deceptively simple words this month at a virtual event hosted to mark the launch of The Wiener Holocaust Library’s new exhibition focused on the death marches, the forced evacuations from the Nazi camps at the end of the Second World War.

Her remarks were brief, composed, and yet disturbing in their detail. She was forced on a death march from a slave labour camp to Bergen-Belsen. The experience shapes her life to this day.
We often hear concern about what will happen to Holocaust education and memory “after the survivors die”. This is not a new debate. But it also implies that we’ve learned all there is to learn from survivors, like Susan, who are very much still with us. Remarkably, Susan spends much of her time speaking to learners of all ages for key Holocaust education organisations in the UK, such as the Holocaust Educational Trust. In 2020, her webcast for Holocaust Memorial Day, was broadcast to thousands of students. Prompted to speak about her experiences in Belsen, Susan provided a fleeting account of the death march.
Yet, as her testimony during this month's event showed, the extreme brutality of the march deeply marked her experience, and that of tens of thousands of other survivors of “liberation” and survival, just as much as Auschwitz-Birkenau and Bergen-Belsen.
Contrary to widespread belief, survivors did speak about their experiences, including the death marches, in the days and months following the end of hostilities. Most were in terrible physical condition – and some did not survive very long after they began to receive medical assistance from Allied armies and humanitarian relief groups. Soon after war’s end, evidence was gathered about the tortuous evacuations that the Germans perpetrated, as they sent prisoners on brutal marches that crisscrossed Germany. These “mobile concentration camps” came within sight of many villages and towns across the country. Bodies of those executed and discarded en route were found, and while many could not be identified, most were reburied with some form of dignity. The people who had survived, civilian witnesses who saw what happened, and victims’ bodies that had been recovered form the basis of evidence of what we know today about the death marches.
The Wiener Holocaust Library’s latest exhibition, Death Marches: Evidence and Memory, which will be on view in London and in Huddersfield at the Holocaust Exhibition and Learning Centre from May 2021 through the summer, describes a significant part of the history of “liberation” that is not fully understood or researched, and also reveals the process of gathering evidence and how historians and other scholars have used this evidence to write the history of the death marches over several decades.

It is an exhibition about the marches themselves, and also about how research is done. And it rests on transforming existing scholarship conducted by historians like Daniel Blatman and Danuta Czech and new work by Dan Stone into a digestible, three-dimensional format.
The new exhibition programme offers a challenge to National Holocaust Centre and Museum CEO Marc Cave’s recently stated view that “there is brilliant academic scholarship on the Holocaust but too little of it benefits the mainstream.” He asserted that “the public” only “harvest the chaff” and “not the wheat” of scholarship.

While it is true that there is often a gap between public understanding of the Holocaust and the latest academic research, our experience shows that this is not for lack of interest or due to a lack of will – either from the public or from many scholars working in the field.
What we can agree on is that there needs to be more, concerted public engagement on the Holocaust framed to ensure that new scholarly findings – and insight into how those findings are reached – are made widely available.

To get more from opinion, click here to sign up for our free Editor's Picks newsletter.