Become a Member
Geoffrey Alderman

By

Geoffrey Alderman,

Geoffrey Alderman

Opinion

Anglo-Jewry’s leaders must act

May 10, 2012 18:22
2 min read

Last month the Times of Israel carried an essay by one Shimon Cohen attacking the distinguished former leader of Australian Jewry, Isi Leibler, who is now based in Israel. In March Leibler - a onetime senior vice-president of the World Jewish Congress - had launched a blistering critique of the current leadership of British Jewry. Cohen, the head of a public-relations company whose clients include some of Anglo-Jewry's good and great, took issue with Leibler's exposé of the "trembling Israelites" in charge of this world. "British Jewish life," Cohen insisted, "is experiencing something of resurgence, proud of its heritage, connected to Israel and finding its voice. Far from running for cover, British Jews are walking tall."

Leibler is capable of defending himself. I want rather to bring to your attention two sets of developments that seem to me to warrant consideration at the highest levels of the Anglo-Jewish world. In so doing I want to assure Mr Cohen that I do not mind which particular moneyed macher addresses these matters of principle. The important thing is that they are addressed, and solutions found. And that there is no hint of a fudge.

The first concerns the strange goings-on behind the closed door of the taxpayer-funded Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust. Last week the Trust was to have hosted a workshop entitled "The Role of Negotiation in Dealing with Conflict". The session was cancelled following pressure from Unison, whose anti-Jewish inclinations drove it to object to the choice, as presenter of this workshop, of a distinguished Israeli academic who is a known authority on crisis management and conflict resolution.

Unison claimed that its objection to Professor Moty Crystal merely derived from its espousal of a boycott of Israeli goods and services. But this explanation strikes me as hollow and specious in the extreme. The bottom line is that in this green and pleasant land discrimination against someone - anyone - on the grounds of their citizenship or ethnicity is prima facie racist and, therefore, illegal. So my question to Mr Cohen is: What are you and the moneyed machers in whose defence you have chosen to speak going to do about it?

To get more from opinion, click here to sign up for our free Editor's Picks newsletter.