Become a Member
Nathan Jeffay

ByNathan Jeffay, Nathan Jeffay

Analysis

Joseph's Tomb fight has just begun

May 12, 2011 12:00
1 min read

It is a proposal that, if adopted, is likely to cause significant Israeli-Palestinian friction. On Sunday, Israeli Vice Prime Minister Silvan Shalom advocated making the purported tomb of the Biblical Joseph, which falls under Palestinian Authority jurisdiction in Nablus, a designated Israeli "heritage site".

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu staked his claim on Jewish sites in the West Bank 18 months ago, giving the "heritage site" designation to the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron and Rachel's Tomb in Bethlehem - and attracting international criticism in doing so. So why now the suggestion regarding Joseph's Tomb?

The catalyst has been the death of 24-year-old Israeli Ben-Yosef Livnat at the site last month. He was shot by Palestinian police after entering PA jurisdiction without authorisation or the requisite co-ordination with the Israeli army. Though likely to be deemed a procedural error by both ongoing PA and Israeli army investigations, the incident sparked fury on the Israeli right, including in Mr Shalom's Likud party.

But Joseph's Tomb started brewing as an issue long before the shooting. In recent months, clandestine visits to the tomb have become increasingly common. While the army organises a secured monthly visit for around 800 people, some 400 are believed, like the late Livnat, to make unauthorised visits.