Guilty verdict for jihadists plotting to commit mass murder following Yom Kippur attack is an urgent warning to authorities to confront the root cause
December 24, 2025 14:42
“God willing we will degrade and humiliate them (in the worst way possible) and hit them where it hurts.” Walid Saadaoui, one of two men found guilty this week of preparing a terror attack against Manchester’s Jewish community, wanted nothing less than to “run rivers of impure blood”.
Saadaoui and his fellow terrorist Amar Hussein were driven by a singularly evil vision. As Greater Manchester Police put it, they believed it was their “duty to kill as many Jewish people as possible”. The details of the case, heard by jurors at Preston Crown Court, were chilling. Unashamed Islamists who proclaimed that “terrorism is our religion”, the two men were actively smuggling four AK-47 assault rifles, two handguns and 1,200 rounds of ammunition into the UK. They planned to wear items of Jewish clothing while carrying out a murderous shooting spree, inspired by the Paris terror attacks they openly admired.
Greater Manchester Police — a force with painful experience of Islamist terrorism — said this plot “potentially could have been the deadliest terrorist attack in UK history”.
British Jews are already on edge following the attack on Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation in October. This case brings home, with brutal clarity, the scale and immediacy of the threat now facing the community.
The revelation in court that Saadaoui had been gathering intelligence about last January’s March Against Antisemitism in Manchester will make for particularly painful reading. So too will the fact that he used a fake account to join the Facebook group of the Jewish Representative Council of Greater Manchester and conducted surveillance of Jewish schools, nurseries and synagogues around Prestwich.
Saadaoui boasted to an undercover police officer that he viewed Jews as “pigs and monkeys”. This language reflects a selective and extremist twisting of the Qur’an, deliberately favoured and propagated by Hamas and similar Islamist movements to dehumanise Jews and sanctify violence against them. It is not theology; it is incitement.
We also need to be clear about motivation. Manchester’s Jewish community was not targeted simply because of events in the Middle East. The truth runs deeper — and darker. These men did not hate Jews because of Israel; they hated Israel because they hate Jews. Antisemitism and anti-Zionism here feed each other in a vicious, self-reinforcing circle. Hussein told investigators that “your government, your Prime Minister has sent weapons to kill our children”. That grievance was used to justify the targeting of Jews in Britain, thousands of miles from any battlefield.
This may be obvious to readers of the JC, but it is still too often missed or downplayed elsewhere. The failure to recognise how obsessive hostility towards Israel can slide rapidly into violent antisemitism has been conspicuous in much of the reporting of this case.
That matters, because the broader atmosphere does real harm. Repeated exposure to violent and absolutist rhetoric — chants such as “globalise the intifada” or “from the river to the sea” — has empowered extremists by blurring moral and legal boundaries. This is not always because people intend violence, but because violent language becomes normalised.
There is a genuine and difficult challenge here for the police and prosecutors. Defendants may claim metaphor, political speech, or protection under free expression, and juries can be reluctant to convict where intent appears contested. But the status quo is plainly not working. When slogans with long and bloody histories are repeatedly shouted in public, yet rarely tested robustly in court, the message received by extremists is that the risk is low.
It should not have taken years of pleading from the Jewish community — or murderous attacks overseas — for authorities to begin acknowledging that some of this rhetoric may cross into criminality. Nor should public broadcasters continue to dismiss concerns about imbalance or context in coverage that fuels grievance narratives. A clear-eyed reassessment is overdue.
This case also sits within a wider and troubling pattern. The North West of England has seen three serious terrorist incidents involving Jewish targets in as many years. The perpetrators of this foiled plot and the Heaton Park attack came from Wigan and Prestwich, while another Islamist extremist from Blackburn carried out an armed siege at a synagogue near Dallas, Texas in 2022.
Something has gone wrong. Local and national authorities must urgently examine whether recruitment or radicalisation networks are operating in the region and address long-standing concerns about extremist rhetoric in certain religious settings.
I therefore welcome the Charity Commission’s recent decision to open a compliance case into Fountains of Knowledge, the charity that runs Masjid Sunnah Nelson mosque near Burnley, following concerns about sermons delivered there. The mosque, reportedly visited in the past by the Heaton Park attacker, has previously been scrutinised after its imam described Jews as “treacherous”. At the time, Lancashire Constabulary said it found “no evidence” of hate speech.
That judgment, like others, now demands re-examination. Public confidence depends on police and regulators demonstrating that they take Islamist ideology and antisemitic rhetoric seriously, wherever it appears.
While the terror threat across the UK from Islamist extremism remains high, it is Britain’s Jewish community that faces the most immediate and targeted danger.
Our authorities deserve credit for foiling this appalling plot. But praise alone is not enough. If we are serious about protecting British Jews, we must confront — rather than euphemise — the pernicious ideology that drives such hatred, before more lives are placed at risk.
To get more from opinion, click here to sign up for our free Editor's Picks newsletter.
