Lord Lester, a human rights barrister and former government adviser, denied her claims on Twitter on Monday, saying the Parliamentary investigation was “flawed and unfair”.
He said: “I regret the Committee’s conclusions in the light of these materials. There has to be a fair process for investigating sexual harassment claims in Parliament.
“Parliament is supposed to be a bastion of the rule of law but calls for fundamental reform of this procedure have been ignored for 20 years.
“I hope to be judged by my work over decades for gender equality, race relations and free speech.”
According to Ms Sanghera, Lord Lester said, that if she refused, “he would see to it I never had a seat in the House of Lords, and warned me there would be other repercussions for me”.
The committee concluded that Lord Lester’s behaviour amounted to “a grave abuse of power in the performance of his parliamentary duties”.
Initially the subcommittee on peers’ conduct recommended Lester be expelled, the first time such action would have been taken, the Guardian reported.
But afer Lord Lester appealed, the Privileges and Conduct Committee opted instead to enforce a suspension.
