Although it did not explicitly state LUU had formally adopted the IHRA definition, it said the criteria for its complaints process “has covered the working definition laid out by the IHRA”.
The Leeds JSoc welcomed the announcement, saying a referendum “would have caused great distress to Jewish students”.
A spokesman said: “It is clear that a number of steps need to be taken to clarify process and solidify provisions to protect Jewish students from intimidation or harassment, and we look forward to collaborating with LUU on this process.
“We are confident that Jewish students at Leeds University will continue to thrive, and that Leeds will continue to be a hub for a vibrant and diverse Jewish life on campus.”
The national Union of Jewish Students (UJS) also thanked LUU for “working with Leeds JSoc and UJS to prevent a referendum and for reaffirming their support of Jewish students”.
Besides the adoption of the IHRA definition of antisemitism, the motion proposed “training on issues that affect Jewish students and how to tackle antisemitism” for university sabbatical officers.
It also called for the university to hold “at least one Holocaust Memorial Day per year to educate students and remember the victims of the Holocaust”, and to run “awareness and educational events to ensure people understand the issues around the Holocaust and antisemitism”.
