A humour-tinged demonstration took place outside the Guardian’s offices today following uproar over a column which argued that the siting of bakery chain Gail’s near a Palestinian café was “an act of heavy-handed high-street aggression”.
Pro-Israel protesters lined up to deliver Gail’s cakes to the editor of the newspaper after the article was criticised as “a cover for antisemitism”.
The Archway branch of the upmarket chain has been targeted by anti-Israel activists who have smashed windows and spray-painted an inverted red triangle – a symbol associated with terror group Hamas – along with the phrase “reject corporate Zionism”.
Gail’s was founded in the 1990s by Israeli baker Gail Mejia and businessman Ran Avidan. Its first shop was opened in Hampstead in 2005 and is now owned by venture capital firm Bain Capital.
The Guardian article cited campaigners’ objection to Bain’s reported investments “in military technology, including Israeli security companies”.
The small rally, organised by pro-Israel activist group Our Fight, was attended by around two dozen people, who held up a banner saying “Stop the new hate movement”.
Standing outside the newspaper’s office at Kings Place in central London, the group chanted: “We stand with Gail’s. Shame on the Guardian.”
The rally at the Guardian[Missing Credit]
Eve, a rally organiser, said: “I’m a resident of Archway. It’s shocking that within a week of Gail’s opening it was attacked, had seven windows smashed. And then the Guardian newspaper published an article minimising the attack saying it was a small act of petty symbolism.
“They don’t realise that we’re living through a tsunami of Jew hatred.”
Comedian Josh Howie, who was at the protest, said: “[I’m here because of] frustration and disgust with the Guardian. The newspaper has assiduously ignored the hate being directed toward us for years now and arguably now added to it.”
Opposition leader Kemi Badenoch earlier in the week told the JC she was “more than shocked” by the article, which has been widely criticised on social media.
“I mean, to be honest, The Guardian has previous on this, that article, which was pretending to be about Israel… was just yet another cover for antisemitism,” she said.
The Guardian has since published a correction note on the article, which reads: “This article was amended on 17 March 2026. A reference to the arrival of Gail’s feeling like “an act of heavy-handed high-street aggression” has been repositioned to clarify it meant to refer to the described fears about the chain’s impact on small traders.
"Also, a comment contrasting activism that is capable of influencing global events with “small acts of petty symbolism”, which was not intended to minimise local vandalism but rather to suggest its misdirected futility, has been removed to avoid misunderstanding."
To get more news, click here to sign up for our free daily newsletter.
