Become a Member
Life

Year of the Rat review: ‘proof the threat to British Jews from the far right never went away’

This report on the new face of the far right is timely and frightening in equal measure

June 11, 2025 16:29
Web main image.png
England's shame: last month's Great British National Strike rally on Downing Street
3 min read

In the introduction to Year Of The Rat, his illuminating and disturbing portrait of today’s British far right, Harry Shukman notes he has “a personal stake… I am not spiritually or culturally Jewish, but I come from a Jewish family… I am fascinated and maddened by the persistence of antisemitic prejudice.”

Many Jews who might thus describe themselves – who feel, as some would put it, “Jew-ish rather than Jewish” – have learnt that when you “come from a Jewish family”, you’re as much a Jew as any other to an antisemite. Shukman reminds us that while we have, for good reasons, been focused lately on the threat from the left, the menace from the other direction has in no way diminished.Shukman is a reporter, and writes like one. He offers subjective descriptions of the people he meets and he records his own emotions as his undercover mission starts to frighten and consume him – but he does so clearly and perceptively. That he undertook this dirtiest of jobs for the advocacy organisation “HOPE not hate”, one of the rare self-labelled anti-racist organisations that has shown the slightest interest in challenging left-wing and Islamist antisemitism, is another strength of the book.

Plausibility is their currency; “far-right, moi?” their byword

His account moves among monsters who are all too human. There are the familiar old-school nationalists and fascists, the thuggish far right of the popular imagination. But as Shukman shows, intimidating as they are at ground level, they now represent the least of the movement’s broader dangers, thanks to their innate and frequently comical inability to disguise themselves. Far more insidious are the manosphere influencers, grifters, intellectuals, political insiders, entrepreneurs, scientific racists, pro-natalists, eugenicists and sundry slippery combinations thereof who form a loose but tautening network which aims to infiltrate institutions. Plausibility is their currency; “far-right, moi?” their byword. Some, such as Andrew Sabisky, a “race science” enthusiast hired by Dominic Cummings during the latter’s stint as chief adviser to then Prime Minister Boris Johnson, have come very close indeed to the levers of power; and, as Sabisky hints to Shukman, perhaps remain so. (Sabisky resigned following criticism of alleged past remarks on pregnancies, eugenics and race).