Become a Member
Life

Why we should all be more like sorry Ken

April 11, 2012 13:10
Ken Livingstone’s apology was startling and, if sincere, showed maturity

ByGerald Jacobs, Gerald Jacobs

2 min read

One of the most salutary effects of ageing is the realisation that the advancing years do not necessarily bring wisdom or emotional maturity. When something goes wrong, you still look for somebody else to blame. If you break a vase, you curse whoever left it in your way, and any motoring mishap is inevitably the other driver's fault. And, while scapegoats are handy for evading personal responsibility, the harshness of reality can be avoided by seeking comfort in self-delusion.

This is well-illustrated by the old tale of a Jewish journalist called Levy who applied for a job as a television news-reader. He didn't mention, however, that he had a serious stammer. When he auditioned and was duly rejected, he naturally put it down to anti-s-s-sssemitism

This joke is an interesting piece of Jewish comic irony, in that it exercises the celebrated humour of self-deprecation by targeting a Jew who is the exact opposite of self-deprecating. The device is not confined to Jewish humour, its most famous example being the Peter Cook and Dudley Moore sketch in which a one-legged man auditions to play Tarzan ("a role for which two legs would seem to be the minimum requirement"), with its brilliant pay-off, delivered by Cook: "I've got nothing against your right leg… the trouble is, neither have you."

Shying away from responsibility and/or reality is an all-too human trait, applicable to all people of all ages. And there certainly have been several instances of this kind of thing relating to Jews in recent times. In his new book, This Is Not The Way: Jews, Judaism and Israel, Rabbi David Goldberg berates those Zionists who, he says, rebut all criticism of Israel by dismissing it as antisemitism. This raises a number of issues, not least the clear indication that some criticism of Israel is indeed driven by a prejudice more primitive than the politically acceptable "anti-Zionism". But the point - about wilfully missing the point - remains.