Become a Member
Life

New pay rules just won't work

January 19, 2012 11:39

By

Alex Brummer,

Alex Brummer

3 min read

You do not have to be a socialist to think that pay in Britain's boardrooms has gone off the scale. It may seem acceptable for directors to be generously rewarded in times of prosperity but in hard times like now, the least that might be expected is some leadership.

The difficulty is that many top executives, for all the contribution they have made and continue to make to the nation's prosperity, live in a world of their own where the sense of entitlement outweighs normal decent values. As former Confederation of British Industry (CBI) boss Sir Richard Lambert has noted, executives are in danger of being seen as "aliens" living in a "different galaxy from the rest of the community."

There have been plenty of examples of this of late. There was the Tesco head of retail stores who thought it was acceptable to sell £200,000 of shares a week before the company reported falling sales and its shares plunged 16 per cent. At state-owned RBS it was revealed that the head of investment banking John Hourican is due to pick up £4 million in bonuses while the "casino" arm of the bank, which he runs, is to shrink and 3,500 jobs are to be lost. Meanwhile, Barclays chief executive Bob Diamond –- who last year delivered a business lecture urging banks to become better corporate citizens - is due to collect a £10 million pay package.

Something about the boardroom seems to distort values. Lord (Simon) Wolfson, the chief executive of Next, has proved himself year after year among Britain's most successful retailers. But when he appeared on BBC's Question Time late last year he was roundly booed for suggesting an extra £40 million of spending on the Olympic opening celebrations was a "drop in the ocean." Not if you are a family worrying about child benefits or wondering how to pay this winter's heating bills.