Become a Member
Film

Hamlet review: ‘watchable but wearying’★★

This bold and radical version of Shakespeare’s most famous play is lost in a south Indian translation

February 10, 2026 18:04
hamlet1
Friends with benefits: Morfydd Clark as Ophelia and Riz Ahmed as Hamlet in this London-set version of the play
1 min read

After the sob-inducing, multi-Oscar nominated Hamnet, which argues that Shakespeare’s most famous play was inspired by the death of his son, comes Riz Ahmed in the real thing, albeit a Hamlet that has been pared down to less than two hours and with radical changes. Inevitably they are not improvements.

Screenwriter Michael Lesslie has done away with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. He has given Ophelia (Morfydd Clark) significant scenes, which gives her more screen time but a sort of “friends-with-benefits”, less well-defined role. Meanwhile, Timothy Spall’s Polonius is more ageing gangster than doting father.

What grips is the setting. We are in London’s hinterlands of roadside verges and building sites. This is the domain of Ahmed’s Hamlet, not a prince but the gilded son of a south Asian family who own a property dynasty called Elsinore. This take begins intriguingly. Hamlet is washing his father’s body as a priest incants the Hindu scripture Bhagavad Gita. This begs the slightly niche question of whether there might one day be a Jewish Hamlet, which of course, there was.

In Bernard Kops’s play The Hamlet of Stepney Green (1959), the patriarch of a Jewish East End family is no Danish royal, but a hypochondriac pickled-herring salesman. It is a Hamlet with more kvetching than killing.

To get more from Life, click here to sign up for our free Life newsletter.

Topics:

Film