
OPERATION SHYLOCK: A CONFESSION Philip Roth Cape, £14.99
When times are tough, novelists recycle their journalism, and Jews fabricate messiahs. Philip Roth has succumbed extravagantly to both temptations. His 18th novel flourishes long chunks of a New York Times interview with the Israeli writer, Aharon Appelfeld, as well as press-gallery jottings from the John Demjanjuk trial.
Other characters in his cuttings file include the jailed American-Jewish spy, Jonathan Pollard, and the murdered American-Jewish invalid, Leon Klinghoffer, whose travel diary is submitted as some kind of evidence, only to be exposed as fake. There are walk-off parts, too, for Lech Walesa and Yasir Arafat, in what amounts to an economy-class travelogue of the disputed borderline between fact and fiction, televised actuality and surreal recollection. Roth's principal invention in this flickering cast is his own double, an eloquent impersonator who goes by the name of Philip Roth and lives in the King David Hotel in Jerusalem preaching a gospel of "diasporism."
[Missing Credit]
The redeemer will come out of Zion, he proclaims, to return his people, the Ashkenazi Jews, to their natural habitat in East and Central Europe. Walesa likes the idea. The Pope approves. Arafat is exultant. What happens to Jews of Sephardi and West-Rhenish origin does not concern our liberator. His solution has the beauty of simplicity: not to say, finality. There is an abundance of herrings— more red than schmaltz — in this ample spread, as Roth lays on mystification and dissimulation all the way down to his final, 400th page where he declares the book "a work of fiction" with customary disclaimers, and then adds: "This confession is false."
Neither statement is acceptable. As fiction, Operation Shylock lacks the prerequisites of a novel. Set mainly in Israel, it does not bother to describe terrain or locations and its characters are thinner than the paper they occupy. A motherly pair of bosoms is about as much as Roth can spare for the shadowy help meet of his doppelganger-messiah. Lacking anything as compelling as a storyline, the book consists overwhelmingly of diatribes with and against himself, his friends and his alter ego over the destiny of the Jews and other dinner-table topics, among them (twice) the prospects of Philip Roth winning the Nobel Prize for literature.
On the other hand, to regard this hybrid volume as literal "confession" would be equally unjust and potentially actionable, for Roth is too clever a writer to appear unclothed and too sensitive a man to permit real exposure. The cloak-and-dagger stuff is designed, therefore, to confuse readers and convince them that the Roth or Roths in this book are figments of another imagination, probably their own.
Nevertheless, the central preoccupation of "Operation Shylock" is ineluctably Roth himself, his triumphs, his anguish and his acute and unforgiving memory for every critical aspersion ever uttered upon his work. The self-obsession verges on maudlin self-pity when recalling attacks by outraged Jews on Portnoy's Complaint and on preposterous self-importance when recounting favourable reactions to his work. In many of his best novels, not least the Zukerman cycle, Roth employed a credible clone to grind axes for him, a Sunday-Jew rather than Shabbos-goy, who allowed him the liberty of self-expression in areas of extreme inhibition. Here, he attempts the same ploy in the first person or first person plural. But what he achieves is, in the absence of character, only the expression of self.
To see how this article originally appeared in 1993, click here.
To get more from Life, click here to sign up for our free Life newsletter.