closeicon

The JC Letters Page April 28 2017

Dora Hirsh, Anthony Melnikoff, Barry Hyman, Modi Spitzer, Brian Levy and Board of Deputies president Jonathan Arkush share their views with JC readers

articlemain
April 28, 2017 16:52

Is there an upside to the Jewish “bubble” or are faith schools part of the problem?

Last week I read an article in the JC entitled The Downside of the Jewish School Bubble.

Having attended Jewish schools since the age of six (I am now 16 and taking GCSEs), I profoundly disagreed with it. In my experience, being at JCoSS has hugely strengthened my sense of identity. This has served to better equip me to stand up for myself and articulate my views rather than being afraid and ashamed, precisely because I have been nurtured in an environment where I am safe to express them. I have been taught to be secure in my identity. 

There are a number of kids at my school who have anti-Israel opinions, as well as countless other views with which I disagree. Just because most of us are Jewish, it doesn’t mean that everyone thinks and feels the same. I resent the idea that we are never challenged in our views, because we absolutely are. 

Teaching children to be proud of their heritage, whatever that may be, has to be better than putting them in an environment that teaches them to be ashamed. I think many opponents of Jewish schools underestimate our awareness of the non-Jewish world —  we too live in multicultural Britain, and school is only one aspect of our lives. Contrary to the assertion made in the article, I feel confident in my ability to operate outside of the Jewish community, to recognise and challenge antisemitism, as well as other forms of racism, injustice and bigotry as my Jewish identity teaches me to. 

Dora Hirsh, 
London, N3

I agree wholeheartedly with  Leah Pennisi-Glaser in her concerns about faith schools. 

Lord Sacks and I were contemporaries at Christ’s College Finchley in the 1960s. Many others who went on to become leaders of the Jewish community also attended. Almost half the boys were Jewish. But, around 10 years ago, my wife’s nephew was the only Jewish pupil in the sixth form.

I discussed this  with a colleague who is a devout Muslim. She attended Copthall, where she had many Jewish friends.  She told me that, in her community too, there is considerable pressure for children to be sent to faith schools. She also said that, despite living in a “Jewish” part of Hendon, her children do not know any Jewish children. The only Jews they come across are the stereotypes they read about in the media, or the ultra-Orthodox they see in the street.

Faith schools have many clear advantages. My daughter sends her two older children to such. But this comes at a cost. It is also true that many parents choose such schools, not out of religious conviction but out of fear their children will be isolated in a hostile outside world. But if our multicultural society is failing it is because different ethnic and religious communities confine themselves to self imposed ghettos — a problem only likely to become worse in “post Brexit” Britain. Could it not be argued that faith schools, for all their positive aspects, are part of the problem, not the solution?

Anthony Melnikoff, 
Herts EN5

Sanctimonious

The programme for the Copthall Stadium Yom Hashoah event contains one of the most embarrassing pieces of bowdlerisation of Hebrew possible. Hannah Szenesz’s beautiful, moving song Eli, Eli is billed as Keili, Keili. 

This is preposterous fawning upon the wish by some to indulge in what is not religious observance, but a piece of sanctimonious religiosity. The G-dash-D school of thought  is here taken to barmy extremes. I have attended a batmitzvah where a speech was ended by three little girls saying “Halleluka.” This is not a sanctification of The Name, it is a mockery of it.

Barry Hyman,
Bushey Heath

Deputies’ democratic determination

As the national, democratic, representative organisation of the UK Jewish community, we are always open to constructive suggestions about how we can do our work even better (JC April 21).

We are very proud of the work that we do across the country. We take our work to every Jewish community, however big or small, through our Deputies, local representative bodies and organisations. We held a councillors’ seminar in Manchester in February, a similar event in Newcastle-Gateshead in April and we have another planned for Leeds. Our interfaith engagement programme has taken us to Bradford, Leicester and Leeds in the recent past for a series of encounters with faith communities in each location.

For our regional weekend we were in Exeter last month, one of the smallest communities in the country, and there was a record attendance of Deputies travelling from all regions of the country.

Our political engagement extends to all regions. We will be sending our Jewish Manifesto to every Parliamentary candidate standing in the General Election, and in the past year we have published manifestos for the Scottish and Northern Ireland Assemblies and a version in Welsh for the Welsh Assembly Elections. We are in the process of developing a manifesto for local councillors.

Never has the Board of Deputies been more engaged with communities across the UK. We will continue to roll out our programmes and strive to represent every Jew in every community.

Jonathan Arkush
President, Board of Deputies of British Jews,
 London NW5

Ignoring  valuable Charedi charities

In Lionel Salama’s article calling for a radical charity overhaul (JC, April 21) he makes a statement which is both irresponsible and can be taken as offensive.  He states: “In a little over a decade, it is estimated that more than half of Jewish children in the UK will be born to Charedi families.  At best, the mainstream community will stagnate; at worst, it will decline. By 2030, the relatively smaller mainstream community will have to support a larger Jewish community”. 

A widely accepted definition of charity is the voluntary giving of help.  No part of the community “will have” to support anyone. What makes Mr Salama feel that Charedim don’t contribute to charities?

There are hundreds of small charities set up and run by Charedim that operate extremely leanly as opposed to the large mainstream Jewish charities of which Mr Salama speaks, which have huge costs and are cumbersome to operate.  Moreover, in a 2016 JPR charity report, they found that Jews in general are more likely to give to non-Jewish charities then Jewish ones.  In the same report, it identifies that the more religious give larger amounts and  are more likely to give to Jewish causes, the most religious giving only to Jewish causes.  Therefore as the “mainstream” declines, the evidence suggests contributions to Jewish charity will rise. 

Modi Spitzer, 
Manchester M25

Lionel Salama asserts that when the Jewish Blind Society and the Jewish Welfare Board merged to create Jewish Care, Norwood Child Care was invited to join but Norwood’s lay leaders declined. 
Norwood received no such invitation which in any case would have been inappropriate given the very different client base.

Brian Levy, Chairman Norwood Child Care 1986-1992, 
London NW3

April 28, 2017 16:52

Want more from the JC?

To continue reading, we just need a few details...

Want more from
the JC?

To continue reading, we just
need a few details...

Get the best news and views from across the Jewish world Get subscriber-only offers from our partners Subscribe to get access to our e-paper and archive