Become a Member
Yoni Birnbaum

ByYoni Birnbaum, Yoni Birnbaum

Opinion

Shuls must not close their doors for winter

'The facilities which faith communities offer are not luxuries. They are essential, frontline services, which provide a lifeline of spiritual and often physical support, particularly during difficult times.'

October 13, 2020 14:19
The entrance to the synagogue
3 min read

A particularly wonderful Israeli phrase is acharei hachagim, literally translated as, “after the festivals”. This innocuous phrase is liberally applied to any situation one would prefer not to deal with now. “After Yomtov, I’ll get to it”. Of course, people start to get a little suspicious when the phrase is used soon after Pesach — with Succot in mind. Sometimes, acharei hachagim never arrives.

In many communities, there has been a strong sense of acharei hachagim about the past few months. Focusing on how to navigate the High Holydays under Covid-regulations left little time to consider how shuls might function after Yomtov was over. Yet Boris Johnson’s depressing announcement that social distancing regulations may well have to last another six months should galvanise us into putting together a meaningful long-term plan for the winter months.

Personally, I found it significant that the prime minister emphasised in his address to Parliament on September 22 that people should draw comfort from the fact that houses of worship could remain open. Assuming (and this is a big assumption), that this remains the government position, I see in this a measure of trust being placed on communal leaders. Take responsibility for your buildings, make sure that they operate in a Covid-secure way and they can stay open. Do the opposite, however, and they may need to be closed, both for the safety of their attendees as well as wider society.

So, shuls will need to tread a very fine line going forward. As always, there will be extreme examples in both directions. There will, sadly, be examples of communities that are lax in ensuring that their facilities are Covid-secure, or that the relevant regulations are followed. This is obviously dangerous from a health and safety perspective, as well as irresponsible in the sense of abusing the trust placed upon houses of worship by the Government. If we want our communal buildings to stay open, we need to continuously demonstrate that they are safe.