As Irish Taoiseach Michéal Martin prepares for his annual St Patrick’s Day visit to the White House, his government remains committed to passing sanctions against Israel – arguably America’s most important military ally at a moment when Washington and Jerusalem are jointly confronting the Islamic Republic of Iran. The timing could hardly be worse. With Congress and the administration fiercely opposed to such policies, Ireland appears willing to risk vital diplomatic and economic interests to indulge its irrational obsession with the Jewish state.
The looming question is simple: will Dublin risk its special relationship with Washington for the sake of ideological posturing? At the centre of the dispute is the Prohibition of Importation of Goods Bill, which Tánaiste Simon Harris said last week could be ready before the summer.
The legislation would criminalise the “importation of goods originating in an Israeli settlement”, defined as any “city, village or industrial zone located in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem”. In effect, Ireland’s leaders are attempting to impose their own verdict on the final status of disputed territories. The logic of the bill would even place Jerusalem’s ancient Jewish Quarter beyond the pale.
At the same time, the bill conflicts with EU law by making a unilateral decision on trade policy, an area in which the European Union has exclusive competence. It also runs up against US federal law, which prohibits American companies from complying with unsanctioned foreign boycotts.
Washington has already reacted sharply. Senator Jim Risch, chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, warned that Ireland had embarked on a “hateful” path. Senator Lindsey Graham added that “I do not believe these efforts would be well received in the United States and they certainly would not go unnoticed.”
US retaliation would be deeply damaging. Large US multinationals based in Ireland pay roughly €21 billion in corporation tax each year – about 75 per cent of the total collected in 2024 – and employ some 220,000 people.
Yet the bill reflects a broader pattern in Irish policy, in which positions towards Israel appear driven less by responsible geopolitics than by ideological hostility.
Six months after the October 7 massacre, Ireland recognised a Palestinian state with no defined borders, functioning government or meaningful expectation that it would cease supporting terrorism. Dublin has also joined South Africa’s “genocide” case against Israel at the International Court of Justice, attempting to stretch the legal definition of genocide in order to secure a guilty verdict. Irish officials have been pressing Brussels to suspend the EU–Israel Trade Agreement and impose sanctions on Israel.
At a meeting of the EPP – the political group uniting centre-right European parties – Fine Gael even voted against a motion condemning the October 7 attacks and calling for the release of the hostages — even though an eight-year-old Irish girl had been kidnapped and held captive for six weeks and the Irish citizen Kim Damti, 21, had been murdered at the Nova music festival.
At the same time, the Irish state has upgraded relations with the Islamic Republic of Iran. In September 2024 Ireland reopened an embassy in Tehran. Earlier that year Fine Gael, the party of Deputy Prime Minister Simon Harris, who was then Taoiseach, invited the Iranian ambassador to its party conference – but snubbed the Israeli ambassador. Even when it emerged that Hezbollah had murdered an Irish peacekeeper, Private Seán Rooney, there was no political outrage directed at Hezbollah’s paymasters in Tehran.
The cumulative effect has been a collapse in relations with Israel. Jerusalem closed its embassy in Dublin, making Ireland one of the few European capitals without an Israeli diplomatic presence. Foreign Minister Gideon Saar cited a complete breakdown in communication and said Ireland had crossed “every red line”. Deepening ties with Iran while severing them with Israel speaks volumes about the ideological narratives now shaping Irish diplomacy.
Public rhetoric has hardly helped. Former President Michael D Higgins has repeatedly advanced claims widely condemned as defamatory towards Israel, such as that Jerusalem would like “to have a settlement in Egypt”, and used a Holocaust Memorial event to attack the Jewish state. The current president has described Israel as a “terrorist state” built on “Jewish supremacy” and has defended Hamas as “part of the fabric of the Palestinian people”.
Ireland’s hostility towards the Jewish state has become almost a kind of national reflex so intense that ideological blindness now threatens Ireland’s relationship with the US. One is struck by the sheer arrogance of Irish politicians, whose livelihoods will not be threatened by the potential commercial fallout, in attempting to pass something that could prove so harmful to Irish workers.
Ireland must therefore reconsider its relationship with the world and how it views itself. What will the country gain from this, other than a sense of self-righteousness? Why can Ireland not put its own interests first?
One can only hope that Taoiseach Micheál Martin uses his time in Washington to quietly bury this legislation – before Dublin inflicts serious damage to its economy and true national interests.
Jamie O'Mahony is a passionate student writer and public speaker from Limerick, Ireland and a CAMERA UK fellow for 2025/26. He has chaired his university's debate society and is deeply engaged in Irish, European, and Middle Eastern political discourse
To get more from opinion, click here to sign up for our free Editor's Picks newsletter.