Become a Member
Opinion

Grotesque to credit Labour for voting to obey the law

The JC leader, 1 October 2021

September 30, 2021 09:24
Labour GettyImages-1235532984
Shadow Foreign secretary Lisa Nandy speaks on stage on the third day of the annual Labour Party conference in Brighton, on the south coast of England on September 27, 2021. (Photo by JUSTIN TALLIS / AFP) (Photo by JUSTIN TALLIS/AFP via Getty Images)
1 min read

It was important and right that Labour’s conference approved the rule changes the party had been instructed to make by the Equality and Human Rights Commission.

But the idea that some have sought to push that Sunday’s vote in favour of the changes represents some sort of triumph for the party, for Keir Starmer or for the Jewish community, and that we can all now happily embrace Labour once more without reservation, is grotesque.

The clue is in the word ‘instructed’. Labour had no choice but to adopt the rule changes. The EHRC’s damning investigation required it to do so. It deserves no credit for simply agreeing to obey the law.

And a substantial number of delegates — around a quarter — refused to support the new rules. They believed, in other words, that the right for the party to provide a home to antisemites was more important than acting lawfully.

To get more from opinion, click here to sign up for our free Editor's Picks newsletter.