By

Raheem Kassam

Opinion

End this dangerous distinction

September 24, 2012 11:38
2 min read

In March 2012, at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee conference, Benjamin Netanyahu asked, of Iran's nuclear programme: "If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then what is it?"

This speech, which garnered much international attention and even a YouTube remix, largely set the stage for the rest of this year's debate on Iran's nuclear programme and the resultant responses from the international community.

But if Iran is a nuclear duck, then Hizbollah is the terrorist elephant in the room, with few in Europe assuming the responsibility of dealing effectively with the organisation.

It comes as a surprise to many when I mention that, while Canada, America and the Netherlands have all proscribed Hizbollah as a terrorist organisation in its entirety, the UK and European Union still acknowledge a distinction between Hizbollah's "political" and "military" wings. This is not a delineation that Hizbollah itself makes, but one that the EU and UK give it of their own accord.

To get more from opinion, click here to sign up for our free Editor's Picks newsletter.

Support the world’s oldest Jewish newspaper