Do both The JC and The Guardian censor blogs?

There is ample evidence to confirm that The Guardian's blog editors routinely censor any comment that is supportive of Israel. It is a totalitarian approach which holds free speech in utter contempt.

But is The JC doing the converse? Is The JC censoring comments that are critical of Israel?

If The JC is not censoring anti-Israel, or anti-zionist posts, is it not both morally and intellectually superior to The Guardian? Why is The JC able to tolerate a debate whilst The Guardian is unable to do so?

Surely, on this basis alone, The Guardian's editor should resign, and return a once great newspaper to its fine traditions.