Become a Member
Opinion

Britain was right to reject UNHRC’s hate declaration

The JC Leader, 14 October 2021

October 14, 2021 16:39
united nations
A French member of the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) stand to attention as he holds up the United Nations flag during a ceremony for the French contingent in their base in the southern town of Deir Kifa on March 28, 2012. France is planning to reduce its UNFIL force members by some 400 soldiers. AFP PHOTO/MAHMOUD ZAYYAT (Photo credit should read MAHMOUD ZAYYAT/AFP/Getty Images)
1 min read

The most newsworthy aspect of Monday’s vote at the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) to reaffirm the notorious 2001 anti-Israel “Durban Declaration” should be that 32 countries, to their shame, cast such an unambiguous and unapologetically antisemitic vote.

The declaration was poisonous, attacking Israel as guilty of racism, while naming no other state at all — after a conference which was openly antisemitic. But the nature of the UNHRC means that such a vote is not remotely noteworthy.

Its 47 members include such paragons of human rights as Afghanistan, Egypt, Iraq, Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela, and its meetings appear to have only one purpose — to find as many different ways as possible of pillorying Israel. It is a repellent organisation.

That is why the most notable votes cast on Monday were in fact the 10 in opposition to the declaration, led by the UK. The Durban Declaration has to date been reaffirmed every two years without opposition and thus without a vote.

To get more from opinion, click here to sign up for our free Editor's Picks newsletter.