Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation

Germany debates Mein Kampf legalisation

    Almost everywhere in the world, Hitler's Mein Kampf is a dubious bestseller, even 70 years after the end of the war. But in Germany, it is illegal to publish it. That is, until next year.

    At the end of 2015, the copyright - owned by the state of Bavaria - runs out and, strictly speaking, this notoriously antisemitic book is fair game for publishers of all kinds. It is something not all Germans are ready for.

    But following last week's conference of Germany's justice ministers on the island of Rügen, the legal future of this extremely boring but chilling work seems set.

    The upshot is that the ministers will seek to ban the publication in general but that a new law is not necessary to that end. They also said that a scholarly, annotated edition should come out as planned in 2016.

    In fact, the Munich-based Institute for Contemporary History, to which Bavaria has given more than £400,000 to produce the volume, is completing the edition now and will publish it in January 2016.

    At the end of 2015, Hitler's book will be fair game for all kinds of publishers

    Even Dieter Graumann, head of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, has agreed that an annotated version is the lesser evil, although he has described it as "awful".

    The acerbic Jewish commentator Henryk Broder has joined the fray, telling the Nordwest Zeitung that those who support extending the ban exhibit a "profound lack of trust of their own 'stupid' people".

    After the war, the Bavarian Finance Ministry inherited the copyright and, until now, has barred publication in Germany in an effort to limit the spread of Hitler's ideology.

    In 2012 the ministry announced it would allow the annotated edition to be published after the copyright expires. But in December 2013, it decided to withdraw from the project, after Munich Jewish leader Charlotte Knobloch, former head of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, formally opposed publication in the name of concerned Holocaust survivors.

    At the time, institute director Andreas Wirsching said work would continue anyway. He called the work a "key source on the history of National Socialism" that should be studied, and said that the perspectives of Holocaust survivors were an important guideline.

    He added: "As we see it, a scholarly, annotated edition with critical explanations is urgently needed to counter the uncontrollable dissemination of this text."

World

Netanyahu invited to meet Abbas in Paris

Rosa Doherty

Wednesday, December 7, 2016

Netanyahu invited to meet Abbas in Paris
World

Will the Austrian election make Norbert Hofer E...

Sonia Zhuravlyova

Will the Austrian election make Norbert Hofer E...
World

Trump picks ex-Goldman Sachs banker as Treasury...

JC Reporter

Thursday, December 1, 2016

Trump picks ex-Goldman Sachs banker as Treasury...
World

'Jews should pay for their own security' say Swiss

Daniel Sugarman

Sunday, December 4, 2016

'Jews should pay for their own security' say Swiss
World

Australian abuse report

Henry Benjamin

Australian abuse report
World

'Neo-Nazi codes' appear in German supermarket a...

Toby Axelrod

Thursday, December 1, 2016

'Neo-Nazi codes' appear in German supermarket a...
World

It's Chanucah Song time!

Michael Moran

Thursday, December 1, 2016

It's Chanucah Song time!
Israel

Israeli navy submarine deal could be sunk

Anshel Pfeffer

Israeli navy submarine deal could be sunk
World

Fire-ravaged Israelis ‘may no longer be married...

Michael Moran

Thursday, December 1, 2016

Fire-ravaged Israelis ‘may no longer be married...