Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation

It's a mad, bad world. And that's just the UN

    Put formulations such as "United Nations", "Human Rights" and "Palestinian territories" into the same sentence and, chances are, you're in for a peculiar experience. Add to that sentence the name "Richard Falk" - UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories - and you've entered the theatre of the absurd.

    Mr Falk, who doubts official accounts of 9/11, was on fine form last week in delivering a report to the UN General Assembly.

    His central point was that settlement policy in east Jerusalem and the West Bank had now become so extensive that "de jure 'occupation' " had mutated into "de facto annexation". Moreover: "If the conditions on the West Bank and east Jerusalem are substantially irreversible," he said, "it becomes misleading and diversionary to continue adherence to the 'two-state consensus'."

    With references to "settler colonialism" and "apartheid features" thrown into the discussion for good measure, it is clear what Mr Falk is driving at: a one-state solution in which Israel is dismantled as a Jewish state.

    That does not come as a surprise. Mr Falk is a fanatical anti-Zionist whose efforts to demonise Israel know no bounds. In 2007, he wrote an article entitled "Slouching toward a Palestinian Holocaust", in which he said: "Is it an irresponsible overstatement to associate the treatment of Palestinians with [the] criminalised Nazi record of collective atrocity? I think not."

    "Biased" does not seem an adequate retort. But this, after all, is the United Nations and Mr Falk is quite comfortable declaring his views there. As he put it in last week's address: "I have been accused of being one-sided, but the reality is one-sided and that is the essential insight."

    I beg to differ. Whatever one thinks of the settlements, the occupation, Jerusalem or any other issue related to the conflict, "the essential insight" is that that conflict is fated to endure so long as people and institutions charged with resolving it remain consumed by unbending dogma. For it is only when truth, balance and reason prevail that Israel and the Palestinians can make the necessary compromises to forge a lasting peace, something that will not be achieved by cheerleading the most extreme Palestinian prejudices at the UN in New York.

Analysis

No Fidelity: Castro's complex relationship with...

Colin Shindler

Thursday, December 1, 2016

No Fidelity: Castro's complex relationship with...
Analysis

Israel faces up to complex challenge

Nathan Jeffay

Thursday, November 24, 2016

Israel faces up to complex challenge
Analysis

Israel eyes opportunities - cautiously

Anshel Pfeffer

Thursday, November 24, 2016

Israel eyes opportunities - cautiously
Analysis

Mosul has been freed before - ask Jonah

Lawrence Joffe

Thursday, December 1, 2016

Mosul has been freed before - ask Jonah
Analysis

The Chief Rabbi is walking a tightrope

Simon Rocker

Thursday, November 24, 2016

The Chief Rabbi is walking a tightrope
Analysis

Will these men make world safer? Not likely

Jason Burke

Thursday, November 24, 2016

Will these men make world safer? Not likely
Analysis

Castro supported Cuban aliyah

Jordan Lancaster

Thursday, December 1, 2016

Castro supported Cuban aliyah
Analysis

Row over Democrats' Muslim hopeful

Jonathan Cummings

Thursday, November 24, 2016

Row over Democrats' Muslim hopeful
Analysis

Returning Daesh can profit from Arab despair

John R Bradley

Thursday, November 24, 2016

Returning Daesh can profit from Arab despair