Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation

Expert View: Don't lose out on loss

    The global downturn has had many significant effects on the way companies do business. One change that has arisen is that companies are now showing greater levels of awareness of the risks they face, and as a result, there has been a greater demand for insurance. A particular type of insurance that is attracting attention is business interruption insurance.

    This covers loss of income caused by disruption to a business after an unforeseen disaster, such as a fire or flood. For instance, if a shop premises was destroyed by a flood, the buildings and contents insurance might pay out to cover the costs of repairing the premises and replacing stock. But, without business interruption insurance, it would not cover the revenue lost by the company while the rebuilding was taking place.

    However, businesses need to be aware that interruption insurance cannot always be relied upon, as illustrated in a recent High Court case, Orient Express Hotels v Assicurazioni General S.p.A. The case was brought by a New Orleans hotel owner whose premises were damaged by hurricanes Katrina and Rita in the autumn of 2005. The hurricanes also brought the city of New Orleans to a standstill.

    The Court considered that the hotel's business would have been interrupted in any event as a result of the widespread damage to New Orleans. It therefore concluded that on a proper interpretation of the hotel owner's business interruption policy - which included a typical clause requiring loss to have been caused by damage to physical property - there was no insurance cover. The decision is considered controversial and is due to be appealed.

    It seems that business interruption insurance, in its standard form, may provide more limited cover than insured businesses may at first think. When the Icelandic volcano Eyjafjallajökull erupted last year, leading to the closing of international airspace, many businesses may have thought their business interruption insurance would pay out for associated losses. But a standard business interruption policy will only respond to economic losses which flow from physical damage to the insured property. Companies suffering from loss caused by a widespread catastrophe cannot always point to physical damage to their property. A pure loss of revenue created by the grounding of air freight or the inability of employees and customers to travel does not satisfy this requirement.

    However, the insurance industry is likely to develop products which are more tailored to respond to the type of operational risks faced by businesses demonstrated by the Eyjafjallajökull eruption, which reportedly costed BAA an estimated £6m a day. Surely, the demand for this kind of insurance can only increase.

Expert View

‘Time to change’ our approach to pensions

Ros Altmann

Monday, December 16, 2013

‘Time to change’ our approach to pensions
Expert View

Israeli water tech: A valuable resource

Noah Shani

Friday, September 13, 2013

Israeli water tech: A valuable resource
Expert View

Employers must act now over pensions

Ros Altmann

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Employers must act now over pensions
Expert View

New look for retailers’ survival

Stephen Spitz

Monday, November 4, 2013

New look for retailers’ survival
Expert View

We must help our youth source jobs

Zaki Cooper

Thursday, July 25, 2013

We must help our youth source jobs
Expert View

New jobs laws ahead

Jonathan Cantor

Thursday, February 14, 2013

New jobs laws ahead
Expert View

Industrial manufacturing roots resurface in Bri...

Zaki Cooper

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Industrial manufacturing roots resurface in Bri...
Expert View

Social media could affect your firm

Anonymous

Monday, July 1, 2013

Social media could affect your firm
Expert View

Why Cash is not King

Anonymous

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Why Cash is not King