<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thejc.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>Antisemitism</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/antisemitism</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Music’s transcendent potential </title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/comment-and-debate/comment/107895/music%E2%80%99s-transcendent-potential</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;On Wednesday, it was the 200th anniversary of the birth of Richard Wagner. In his birth city of Leipzig he will be celebrated throughout the year. But many Germans have voiced their wariness about music that, to some, resonates with something harsher - Wagner&#039;s proclaimed antisemitism and his adoption by Hitler as a primal force behind Nazism. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wagner lived five decades before the Nazi ideology was conceived. He could not have lent personal credence to Hitler&#039;s views. He is said to have refused to sign any public declaration against the Jews. Yet whether he was a theoretical or a practical antisemite, Wagner was conflicted. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He resented the success of Jewish composers Mendelssohn and Meyerbeer, but had a Jewish conductor, Hermann Levi and - to quote a cliché - some of his best friends were Jews. This did not stop him writing a pamphlet in 1850 deriding the work of Jewish musicians and blaming them for the decline in German culture. Yet he was admired by Theodor Herzl. He also wrote music of great beauty, even spirituality. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An informal, if controversial, boycott of the composer persists in Israel despite attempts by Daniel Barenboim and Zubin Mehta to include him on the grounds that great music transcends politics. His work was not performed in public there until 2000. Music is not ideological, Barenboim argues. Wagner was antisemitic. His music wasn&#039;t.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Still, Israeli concert planners are inclined to respect the anguish of Shoah survivors, who recall Wagner being played in the camps, or the raising of the SS banner when Meistersinger was played during the Nuremberg rallies. Mass protests led Tel Aviv University to cancel a Wagner concert last year. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why is this particular composer so hated? Can he really be blamed for Hitler&#039;s patronage? Does this make him worse than other composers, also outed as antisemitic? Carl Orff was a self-confessed card-carrying Nazi, and Richard Strauss managed to ban all Jewish performers from public view during the Nazi era. Writers from Charles Dickens to T S Eliot have derided Jews or cynically portrayed them in what could be seen as a kind of contemporary social antisemitism - the rejection of &quot;the other&quot;. No one bans them. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But music works in more subtle ways. Wagner&#039;s opera cycle Der Ring des Nibelungen, about the downfall of the gods, includes Jewish caricatures, the dwarves Mime and Alberich. In its time, it was viewed almost as an antisemitic epiphany, an attempt to free German culture from Franco-Jewish influences, eagerly taken up in 1940s Germany.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Broadcaster Paul Mason considers that in his later works, Wagner developed depth and humanity. His three modernist operas are real human dramas, Mason feels. He claims that under the influence of the philosopher Schopenhauer, Wagner abandoned racial purity myths and began to incorporate strands of eastern thought. And Dominic Lawson, in the Independent, argues we should learn to love the music but hate the man.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Perhaps this is the point. Learning to love. Even without charges of antisemitism, some of Wagner&#039;s music is terrifying, suggesting the martial threat that made him Hitler&#039;s favourite composer, and also the brooding quality generated by the Second World War. But then there is the pure elegance of the finale to Tannhauser.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So did Wagner grow out of his small-minded racism and virulent antisemitism to create some of our greatest music? The two seem so contradictory. But in a way, does it really matter? Shouldn&#039;t great art be transcendental? Surely it comes from a different place within the soul of humanity, a place beyond the consciousness of even the greatest artist? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Peter Shaffer&#039;s Amadeus, the composer Salieri complains that Mozart, base and unworthy, had been blessed with the musical genius Salieri himself so deeply craved.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is the disconnect: the only resolution lies in the eternal truth that, once the work is born, it is a separate entity from its creator, and must be allowed to live for its own sake.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/comment-and-debate/comment">Comment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/antisemitism">Antisemitism</category>
 <nid>107895</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 <image />
 <caption />
 <link1>69115</link1>
 <link1_title>Wrong notes in Wagner musical drama</link1_title>
 <link2>53917</link2>
 <link2_title>Zubin Mehta: why I won&#039;t play Wagner</link2_title>
 <footer />
 <body>On Wednesday, it was the 200th anniversary of the birth of Richard Wagner. In his birth city of Leipzig he will be celebrated throughout the year. But many Germans have voiced their wariness about music that, to some, resonates with something harsher - Wagner&#039;s proclaimed antisemitism and his adoption by Hitler as a primal force behind Nazism. 
Wagner lived five decades before the Nazi ideology was conceived. He could not have lent personal credence to Hitler&#039;s views. He is said to have refused to sign any public declaration against the Jews. Yet whether he was a theoretical or a practical antisemite, Wagner was conflicted. 
He resented the success of Jewish composers Mendelssohn and Meyerbeer, but had a Jewish conductor, Hermann Levi and - to quote a cliché - some of his best friends were Jews. This did not stop him writing a pamphlet in 1850 deriding the work of Jewish musicians and blaming them for the decline in German culture. Yet he was admired by Theodor Herzl. He also wrote music of great beauty, even spirituality. 
An informal, if controversial, boycott of the composer persists in Israel despite attempts by Daniel Barenboim and Zubin Mehta to include him on the grounds that great music transcends politics. His work was not performed in public there until 2000. Music is not ideological, Barenboim argues. Wagner was antisemitic. His music wasn&#039;t.
Still, Israeli concert planners are inclined to respect the anguish of Shoah survivors, who recall Wagner being played in the camps, or the raising of the SS banner when Meistersinger was played during the Nuremberg rallies. Mass protests led Tel Aviv University to cancel a Wagner concert last year. 
Why is this particular composer so hated? Can he really be blamed for Hitler&#039;s patronage? Does this make him worse than other composers, also outed as antisemitic? Carl Orff was a self-confessed card-carrying Nazi, and Richard Strauss managed to ban all Jewish performers from public view during the Nazi era. Writers from Charles Dickens to T S Eliot have derided Jews or cynically portrayed them in what could be seen as a kind of contemporary social antisemitism - the rejection of &quot;the other&quot;. No one bans them. 
But music works in more subtle ways. Wagner&#039;s opera cycle Der Ring des Nibelungen, about the downfall of the gods, includes Jewish caricatures, the dwarves Mime and Alberich. In its time, it was viewed almost as an antisemitic epiphany, an attempt to free German culture from Franco-Jewish influences, eagerly taken up in 1940s Germany.
Broadcaster Paul Mason considers that in his later works, Wagner developed depth and humanity. His three modernist operas are real human dramas, Mason feels. He claims that under the influence of the philosopher Schopenhauer, Wagner abandoned racial purity myths and began to incorporate strands of eastern thought. And Dominic Lawson, in the Independent, argues we should learn to love the music but hate the man.
Perhaps this is the point. Learning to love. Even without charges of antisemitism, some of Wagner&#039;s music is terrifying, suggesting the martial threat that made him Hitler&#039;s favourite composer, and also the brooding quality generated by the Second World War. But then there is the pure elegance of the finale to Tannhauser.
So did Wagner grow out of his small-minded racism and virulent antisemitism to create some of our greatest music? The two seem so contradictory. But in a way, does it really matter? Shouldn&#039;t great art be transcendental? Surely it comes from a different place within the soul of humanity, a place beyond the consciousness of even the greatest artist? 
In Peter Shaffer&#039;s Amadeus, the composer Salieri complains that Mozart, base and unworthy, had been blessed with the musical genius Salieri himself so deeply craved.  
Here is the disconnect: the only resolution lies in the eternal truth that, once the work is born, it is a separate entity from its creator, and must be allowed to live for its own sake.</body>
 <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:26:36 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gloria Tessler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">107895 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Football star’s campaign for murdered journalist</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news/107847/football-star%E2%80%99s-campaign-murdered-journalist</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A sporting legend is demanding the resignation of Brazil’s football chief for inciting the murder of a Jewish journalist.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Romario, who scored 1,000 goals in a celebrated international career, has accused Jose Maria Marin, the president of the CBF, Brazilian football’s governing body, over the death of former BBC reporter Vladimir Herzog in 1975.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Together with Herzog’s son, Ivo, Romario, who is now a member of  the Brazilian parliament, handed in a petition last month of 55,000 signatures calling on Mr Marin to step down.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Marin, who is in charge of Brazil’s preparations for hosting the 2014 World Cup, responded by heading to the courts, where he accused Romario of defamation and slander.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vladimir Herzog was a renowned journalist who, aged just 38, was tortured to death by intelligence agents working for the country’s military dictatorship of the time. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He was born in Yugoslavia to Jewish parents who fled to Italy, and then Brazil, to escape the Nazis. He lived in London for three years in the 1960s, where he worked for the BBC.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 1975, he was director of journalism at Sao Paolo-based network TV Cultura when agents summoned him for questioning about his links to the Communist Party, which was outlawed. At the interrogation Mr Herzog was alleged to have been tortured to death, though his original death certificate indicated he had committed suicide.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Marin, now 81, had criticised Mr Herzog in a speech he delivered at the Sao Paolo state legislature two weeks before his interrogation. The following year he made a speech praising Sergio Fleury, the head of a repressive police division who was reportedly involved in Mr Herzog’s torture. Mr Marin was a congressman for ARENA, which supported the military government.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“His past is linked to the dictatorship,” said Romario.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ivo Herzog said: “It would be unacceptable for Marin to head the inaugural ceremony of our World Cup, watched by millions worldwide.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The CBF has defended Mr Marin, branding the allegations “absolutely false”.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news">World news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/antisemitism">Antisemitism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/argentina">Argentina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/football">Football</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/brazil">Brazil</category>
 <nid>107847</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 
 <caption>Vladimir Herzog: tortured to death</caption>
 <link1>107317</link1>
 <link1_title>Wembley appearance for Israeli footballers</link1_title>
 <link2>101706</link2>
 <link2_title>Former BBC journalist rejects anti-Israel prejudice</link2_title>
 <footer />
 <body>A sporting legend is demanding the resignation of Brazil’s football chief for inciting the murder of a Jewish journalist.
Romario, who scored 1,000 goals in a celebrated international career, has accused Jose Maria Marin, the president of the CBF, Brazilian football’s governing body, over the death of former BBC reporter Vladimir Herzog in 1975.
Together with Herzog’s son, Ivo, Romario, who is now a member of  the Brazilian parliament, handed in a petition last month of 55,000 signatures calling on Mr Marin to step down.
Mr Marin, who is in charge of Brazil’s preparations for hosting the 2014 World Cup, responded by heading to the courts, where he accused Romario of defamation and slander.
Vladimir Herzog was a renowned journalist who, aged just 38, was tortured to death by intelligence agents working for the country’s military dictatorship of the time. 
He was born in Yugoslavia to Jewish parents who fled to Italy, and then Brazil, to escape the Nazis. He lived in London for three years in the 1960s, where he worked for the BBC.
In 1975, he was director of journalism at Sao Paolo-based network TV Cultura when agents summoned him for questioning about his links to the Communist Party, which was outlawed. At the interrogation Mr Herzog was alleged to have been tortured to death, though his original death certificate indicated he had committed suicide.
Mr Marin, now 81, had criticised Mr Herzog in a speech he delivered at the Sao Paolo state legislature two weeks before his interrogation. The following year he made a speech praising Sergio Fleury, the head of a repressive police division who was reportedly involved in Mr Herzog’s torture. Mr Marin was a congressman for ARENA, which supported the military government.
“His past is linked to the dictatorship,” said Romario.
Ivo Herzog said: “It would be unacceptable for Marin to head the inaugural ceremony of our World Cup, watched by millions worldwide.”
The CBF has defended Mr Marin, branding the allegations “absolutely false”.</body>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:00:43 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jonathan Gilbert</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">107847 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>MP Lee Scott: I cried over death threat</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/107849/mp-lee-scott-i-cried-over-death-threat</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A Jewish MP has described how he cried after being subjected to an antisemitic death threat while campaigning for re-election.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tory Lee Scott said he needed police protection in his Ilford North constituency following the incident during the general election in 2010. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“I was going back to my car when I was approached by two people who called me a ‘dirty Jewish pig’ and said they were going to kill me. I legged it as fast as I could,” he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“I went home and I cried, not because someone had threatened me but because I felt that I loved my job and I was just not sure it was worth it for my family. It was a horrendous position. No candidate of any religion, race or sexuality should go through it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“At the next hustings I turned up with two police officers for protection.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Scott, 57, was speaking at the first session of the All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Electoral Conduct. A panel of 12 cross-party MPs and peers was set up by Labour MP John Mann earlier this year to investigate misconduct during election campaigns, including incidents of racism and discrimination. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During the 2010 campaign, leaflets were distributed by an unnamed group branding Mr Scott an “enemy of Muslims”. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While campaigning, he said, a man approached him and made abusive, antisemitic comments. “He was holding a leaflet saying I was not favourable to Islam, which is not true. There was a picture of me in a skullcap which must have been taken in a synagogue.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Police fitted a panic alarm at the MP’s home, and members of the Muslim community in his constituency put up banners supporting him. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The panel also heard evidence from Ukip secretary Michael Greaves. A number of Ukip candidates were ejected by the party ahead of the local elections earlier this month amid claims that they had made racist comments during their campaigns or had links with far-right groups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Greaves explained that the party was “ramping up” its selection procedures. “We have to do better,” he said.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news">UK news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/antisemitism">Antisemitism</category>
 <nid>107849</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 
 <caption>Lee Scott: needed police protection</caption>
 <link1>66079</link1>
 <link1_title>MPs: We speak up for Israel - and get death threats</link1_title>
 <link2>83471</link2>
 <link2_title>Ilford MP Lee Scott made Chris Grayling&#039;s secretary</link2_title>
 <footer />
 <body>A Jewish MP has described how he cried after being subjected to an antisemitic death threat while campaigning for re-election.
Tory Lee Scott said he needed police protection in his Ilford North constituency following the incident during the general election in 2010. 
“I was going back to my car when I was approached by two people who called me a ‘dirty Jewish pig’ and said they were going to kill me. I legged it as fast as I could,” he said.
“I went home and I cried, not because someone had threatened me but because I felt that I loved my job and I was just not sure it was worth it for my family. It was a horrendous position. No candidate of any religion, race or sexuality should go through it.
“At the next hustings I turned up with two police officers for protection.”
Mr Scott, 57, was speaking at the first session of the All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Electoral Conduct. A panel of 12 cross-party MPs and peers was set up by Labour MP John Mann earlier this year to investigate misconduct during election campaigns, including incidents of racism and discrimination. 
During the 2010 campaign, leaflets were distributed by an unnamed group branding Mr Scott an “enemy of Muslims”. 
While campaigning, he said, a man approached him and made abusive, antisemitic comments. “He was holding a leaflet saying I was not favourable to Islam, which is not true. There was a picture of me in a skullcap which must have been taken in a synagogue.”
Police fitted a panic alarm at the MP’s home, and members of the Muslim community in his constituency put up banners supporting him. 
The panel also heard evidence from Ukip secretary Michael Greaves. A number of Ukip candidates were ejected by the party ahead of the local elections earlier this month amid claims that they had made racist comments during their campaigns or had links with far-right groups.
Mr Greaves explained that the party was “ramping up” its selection procedures. “We have to do better,” he said.</body>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:56:33 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Marcus Dysch</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">107849 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hytner: Othello&#039;s race &#039;not a big deal&#039; to the Venetians</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/107483/hytner-othellos-race-not-a-big-deal-venetians</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The racism in Othello is not as pronounced as the antisemitism in the Merchant of Venice, the director of the National theatre said this week.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sir Nicholas Hytner, whose critically acclaimed production of Othello starring Adrian Lester and Rory Kinnear is currently selling-out at the National, expressed his view in conversation with JC theatre critic John Nathan at the London Jewish Cultural Centre on Monday evening.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Discussing how the interpretation and reaction to William Shakespeare&#039;s work has changed over time, he noted that in 1604, London audiences would have had a very different response to a man with black skin than they did in 1804 or 1904.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It was written before we had learnt to be as racist as we became,&quot; he said. &quot;I give you as evidence of this the Merchant of Venice. Same city, same world, there isn&#039;t a page in Merchant of Venice which isn&#039;t obsessed with Shylock&#039;s Jewishness.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sir Nicholas, who is only the second person to have run the National Theatre for more than a decade, described Merchant as &quot;an antisemitic play which contains within it a criticism of antisemitism&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Everybody in the play is antisemitic, they ascribe everything bad that is done to Shylock&#039;s Jewishness,&quot; he said. &quot;You can&#039;t imagine Shylock being appointed commander of the armed forces. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;In Othello it&#039;s not a big deal to the Venetian duke and the senators of Venice that they are appointing a Moor. Not many people in Othello are vocally racist.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sir Nicholas, who announced earlier this year that he was standing down from the National in March 2015, said he hoped his swansong would be a production of a new play by an up and coming writer. Although he gave no indication of who his preferred successor would be, he said it was great &quot;for a theatre to have an artist as chief executive&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;His tenure at the National has seen collaborations with Habima, the Israeli theatre company that faced boycott calls when it performed at the Globe Theatre last year. &quot;I don&#039;t personally agree with boycotts,&quot; he said. &quot;None of my colleagues said let&#039;s not work with them.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But he also revealed that as a young pupil of Manchester Grammar School, he initiated his own boycott – of the school&#039;s Jewish choir, joining the non-religious one instead. &quot;The standards were not high enough in the Jewish choir so I boycotted it on musical grounds.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news">UK news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/israel-boycott">Israel boycott</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/racism">Racism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/antisemitism">Antisemitism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/stage">Stage</category>
 <nid>107483</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 
 <caption>The National Theatre (Photo: Tony Hisgett)</caption>
 <link1>105220</link1>
 <link1_title>Nicholas Hytner to leave the National Theatre - in 2015</link1_title>
 <link2>59361</link2>
 <link2_title>How Nicholas Hytner made the National a Jewish theatre</link2_title>
 <footer />
 <body>The racism in Othello is not as pronounced as the antisemitism in the Merchant of Venice, the director of the National theatre said this week.
Sir Nicholas Hytner, whose critically acclaimed production of Othello starring Adrian Lester and Rory Kinnear is currently selling-out at the National, expressed his view in conversation with JC theatre critic John Nathan at the London Jewish Cultural Centre on Monday evening.
Discussing how the interpretation and reaction to William Shakespeare&#039;s work has changed over time, he noted that in 1604, London audiences would have had a very different response to a man with black skin than they did in 1804 or 1904.
&quot;It was written before we had learnt to be as racist as we became,&quot; he said. &quot;I give you as evidence of this the Merchant of Venice. Same city, same world, there isn&#039;t a page in Merchant of Venice which isn&#039;t obsessed with Shylock&#039;s Jewishness.&quot;
Sir Nicholas, who is only the second person to have run the National Theatre for more than a decade, described Merchant as &quot;an antisemitic play which contains within it a criticism of antisemitism&quot;.
&quot;Everybody in the play is antisemitic, they ascribe everything bad that is done to Shylock&#039;s Jewishness,&quot; he said. &quot;You can&#039;t imagine Shylock being appointed commander of the armed forces. 
&quot;In Othello it&#039;s not a big deal to the Venetian duke and the senators of Venice that they are appointing a Moor. Not many people in Othello are vocally racist.&quot;
Sir Nicholas, who announced earlier this year that he was standing down from the National in March 2015, said he hoped his swansong would be a production of a new play by an up and coming writer. Although he gave no indication of who his preferred successor would be, he said it was great &quot;for a theatre to have an artist as chief executive&quot;.
His tenure at the National has seen collaborations with Habima, the Israeli theatre company that faced boycott calls when it performed at the Globe Theatre last year. &quot;I don&#039;t personally agree with boycotts,&quot; he said. &quot;None of my colleagues said let&#039;s not work with them.&quot;
But he also revealed that as a young pupil of Manchester Grammar School, he initiated his own boycott – of the school&#039;s Jewish choir, joining the non-religious one instead. &quot;The standards were not high enough in the Jewish choir so I boycotted it on musical grounds.&quot;</body>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 10:24:34 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jennifer Lipman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">107483 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lord Ahmed quits Labour Party before &quot;Jewish conspiracy&quot; hearing</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/107481/lord-ahmed-quits-labour-party-jewish-conspiracy-hearing</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Lord Ahmed has resigned from the Labour Party ahead of a disciplinary hearing into claims he made comments about a Jewish conspiracy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He was due to face party executives tomorrow after being suspended by the party in March. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;i&gt;Times&lt;/i&gt; uncovered footage recorded in Pakistan in which Lord Ahmed was said to have claimed - while speaking in Urdu - that Jewish lawyers and media were responsible for the length of a prison term he received for causing a fatal car crash.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a &lt;i&gt;JC&lt;/i&gt; interview last week Lord Ahmed suggested he may leave the party before the hearing if he was not presented with a full recording of the interview.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In his resignation letter to party executives Lord Ahmed wrote: “I have been considering my position over the weekend and have concluded that I should resign from the membership… I reject the core story that emerges out of the alleged interview.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Referring to an earlier apology he made in the case, Lord Ahmed said: “Needless to say that I have many Jewish friends and I felt it was important and necessary to do this.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lord Ahmed had previously said he could not remember making the remarks, but apologised unreservedly and said he would be “utterly devastated” if it was proved that he had spoken in such terms.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news">UK news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/antisemitism">Antisemitism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/labour">Labour</category>
 <nid>107481</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 
 <caption>Lord Ahmed</caption>
 <link1>107318</link1>
 <link1_title>Lord Ahmed backtracks on comments of Jewish conspiracy</link1_title>
 <link2>106973</link2>
 <link2_title>Lord Ahmed &#039;will not get fair hearing&#039; claims lawyer</link2_title>
 <footer />
 <body>Lord Ahmed has resigned from the Labour Party ahead of a disciplinary hearing into claims he made comments about a Jewish conspiracy.
He was due to face party executives tomorrow after being suspended by the party in March. 
The Times uncovered footage recorded in Pakistan in which Lord Ahmed was said to have claimed - while speaking in Urdu - that Jewish lawyers and media were responsible for the length of a prison term he received for causing a fatal car crash.
In a JC interview last week Lord Ahmed suggested he may leave the party before the hearing if he was not presented with a full recording of the interview.
In his resignation letter to party executives Lord Ahmed wrote: “I have been considering my position over the weekend and have concluded that I should resign from the membership… I reject the core story that emerges out of the alleged interview.”
Referring to an earlier apology he made in the case, Lord Ahmed said: “Needless to say that I have many Jewish friends and I felt it was important and necessary to do this.”
Lord Ahmed had previously said he could not remember making the remarks, but apologised unreservedly and said he would be “utterly devastated” if it was proved that he had spoken in such terms.</body>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 09:44:15 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zoe Winograd</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">107481 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lawyer fined for saying &quot;she couldn&#039;t stand Jewish people&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/107395/lawyer-fined-saying-she-couldnt-stand-jewish-people</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A lawyer who said that she “couldn’t stand Jewish people” in an office rant in the presence of a Jewish colleague was found guilty of discrimination by a tribunal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Danielle Morris, 34, has been fined £2,500 and ordered to pay £5,250 in costs for the remarks, which were made in 2009, said a judgment that was published this week.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Her comments came about after the assistant solicitor and mother of two took her baby to a medical centre and a man in traditional Orthodox Jewish dress had “caused a scene” and was subsequently dealt with before her.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ms Morris later commented to a receptionist at her firm “I cannot stand Jewish people”. The comment was heard by a Jewish colleague, known only as Mrs S, who responded: “Please do not say that.” Ms Morris replied, referring to the incident at the medical centre: “I don’t care, I cannot stand them ever since an incident at the Bardoc.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When Mrs S complained, Ms Morris denied making the comments. Mrs S then took legal action.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the judgement released this week, Ms Morris’s lawyer said in her defence that she had “not been aware of the long history and persecution of the Jewish people and because of her age had had limited direct contact with those who had been familiar with the discovery of the Holocaust or the attitudes which had led to those events.” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The tribunal heard that she now had a “greater understanding of the offence that she had caused and the context in which her remarks could be seen”.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news">UK news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/antisemitism">Antisemitism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/crime">Crime</category>
 <nid>107395</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 <image />
 <caption />
 <link1 />
 <link1_title />
 <link2 />
 <link2_title />
 <footer />
 <body>A lawyer who said that she “couldn’t stand Jewish people” in an office rant in the presence of a Jewish colleague was found guilty of discrimination by a tribunal.
Danielle Morris, 34, has been fined £2,500 and ordered to pay £5,250 in costs for the remarks, which were made in 2009, said a judgment that was published this week.
Her comments came about after the assistant solicitor and mother of two took her baby to a medical centre and a man in traditional Orthodox Jewish dress had “caused a scene” and was subsequently dealt with before her.
Ms Morris later commented to a receptionist at her firm “I cannot stand Jewish people”. The comment was heard by a Jewish colleague, known only as Mrs S, who responded: “Please do not say that.” Ms Morris replied, referring to the incident at the medical centre: “I don’t care, I cannot stand them ever since an incident at the Bardoc.”
When Mrs S complained, Ms Morris denied making the comments. Mrs S then took legal action.
In the judgement released this week, Ms Morris’s lawyer said in her defence that she had “not been aware of the long history and persecution of the Jewish people and because of her age had had limited direct contact with those who had been familiar with the discovery of the Holocaust or the attitudes which had led to those events.” 
The tribunal heard that she now had a “greater understanding of the offence that she had caused and the context in which her remarks could be seen”.</body>
 <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 15:26:38 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anna Sheinman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">107395 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Orban talks... as Jobbik walks</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news/107292/orban-talks-jobbik-walks</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Viktor Orban, the Hungarian Prime Minister, strongly condemned antisemitism and pledged to honour the memory of Holocaust victims at the World Jewish Congress, which met in Budapest last weekend, but failed to criticise the far-right Jobbik party, the third largest in parliament.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Orban told the delegates: “History has taught the Hungarians that antisemitism must be recognised in time… It is especially important that we make it clear: antisemitism is unacceptable and intolerable.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The government says that it fully supports the renaissance in Jewish life. Between 80,000 and 100,000 Jews live in Hungary, most in Budapest. The city has numerous functioning synagogues, Jewish schools, cafes and restaurants. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Orban emphasised the government’s commitment to commemorating the Holocaust, when more than 500,000 Hungarian Jews were killed. A new government committee will co-ordinate nationwide events next year, the 70th anniversary of the deportations. “It is with a broken heart that we bow our heads in memory of the victims,” said Mr Orban “but thank God that an authentic Jewish community…managed to survive.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Orban pointedly compared Hungary to France as a country where, despite the murder of a teacher and three schoolchildren in an antisemitic attack in Toulouse, there was “no consensus” on whether a minute’s silence could be held in state schools.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But there was strong disappointment that Mr Orban failed to single out Jobbik for condemnation and failed to mention any antisemitic incidents. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ferenc Orosz, the chairman of the Raoul Wallenberg memorial committee, was recently beaten up at a football match after he asked spectators to stop chanting “Mussolini” and “Sieg Heil”. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jobbik’s strong parliamentary presence has emboldened antisemites, said Tamas Vero, a Budapest rabbi who attended the WJC assembly. “The situation became much worse after Jobbik entered parliament in 2010. People hear members of parliament speaking in this way, so it becomes acceptable to speak like this on the streets.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A spokesman for the WJC said that Mr Orban “did not confront the true nature of the problem: the threat posed by the antisemites in general and by the extreme right-wing Jobbik party in particular.” The WJC accused Mr Orban of failing to draw “a clear line” between the government and the right-wing fringe. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, WJC president Ronald Lauder, who was re-elected at the assembly, subsequently apologised for failing to acknowledge Mr Orban’s criticism of Jobbik as “a real danger” in an interview with Ynet, published last Saturday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hundreds of Jobbik activists gathered on Saturday in downtown Budapest to protest against the WJC gathering. Marton Gyongyosi, a Jobbik MP and vice-president of the Parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee, told the rally: “Our country has become subjugated to Zionism, it has become a target of colonisation while we, the indigenous people, can only play the role extras.” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Orban had ordered the far-right gathering to be banned but a court over-ruled his decision.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Board of Deputies President Vivian Wineman, who led a British delegation to the gathering, commented: “The decision to hold the meeting in Budapest was the right one. But Orban missed his opportunity.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news">World news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/world-jewish-congress">World Jewish Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/antisemitism">Antisemitism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/hungary">Hungary</category>
 <nid>107292</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 
 <caption>Supporters of antisemitic party Jobbik march in Budapest to protest against the WJC conference (Photo: Reuters)</caption>
 <link1>93477</link1>
 <link1_title>Anti-hate rally draws 10,000 in Hungary</link1_title>
 <link2>106862</link2>
 <link2_title>Hungarian PM pledges to stop far-right protests ahead of WJC meeting</link2_title>
 <footer />
 <body>Viktor Orban, the Hungarian Prime Minister, strongly condemned antisemitism and pledged to honour the memory of Holocaust victims at the World Jewish Congress, which met in Budapest last weekend, but failed to criticise the far-right Jobbik party, the third largest in parliament.
Mr Orban told the delegates: “History has taught the Hungarians that antisemitism must be recognised in time… It is especially important that we make it clear: antisemitism is unacceptable and intolerable.”
The government says that it fully supports the renaissance in Jewish life. Between 80,000 and 100,000 Jews live in Hungary, most in Budapest. The city has numerous functioning synagogues, Jewish schools, cafes and restaurants. 
Mr Orban emphasised the government’s commitment to commemorating the Holocaust, when more than 500,000 Hungarian Jews were killed. A new government committee will co-ordinate nationwide events next year, the 70th anniversary of the deportations. “It is with a broken heart that we bow our heads in memory of the victims,” said Mr Orban “but thank God that an authentic Jewish community…managed to survive.”
Mr Orban pointedly compared Hungary to France as a country where, despite the murder of a teacher and three schoolchildren in an antisemitic attack in Toulouse, there was “no consensus” on whether a minute’s silence could be held in state schools.
But there was strong disappointment that Mr Orban failed to single out Jobbik for condemnation and failed to mention any antisemitic incidents. 
Ferenc Orosz, the chairman of the Raoul Wallenberg memorial committee, was recently beaten up at a football match after he asked spectators to stop chanting “Mussolini” and “Sieg Heil”. 
Jobbik’s strong parliamentary presence has emboldened antisemites, said Tamas Vero, a Budapest rabbi who attended the WJC assembly. “The situation became much worse after Jobbik entered parliament in 2010. People hear members of parliament speaking in this way, so it becomes acceptable to speak like this on the streets.”
A spokesman for the WJC said that Mr Orban “did not confront the true nature of the problem: the threat posed by the antisemites in general and by the extreme right-wing Jobbik party in particular.” The WJC accused Mr Orban of failing to draw “a clear line” between the government and the right-wing fringe. 
However, WJC president Ronald Lauder, who was re-elected at the assembly, subsequently apologised for failing to acknowledge Mr Orban’s criticism of Jobbik as “a real danger” in an interview with Ynet, published last Saturday.
Hundreds of Jobbik activists gathered on Saturday in downtown Budapest to protest against the WJC gathering. Marton Gyongyosi, a Jobbik MP and vice-president of the Parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee, told the rally: “Our country has become subjugated to Zionism, it has become a target of colonisation while we, the indigenous people, can only play the role extras.” 
Mr Orban had ordered the far-right gathering to be banned but a court over-ruled his decision.
Board of Deputies President Vivian Wineman, who led a British delegation to the gathering, commented: “The decision to hold the meeting in Budapest was the right one. But Orban missed his opportunity.”</body>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 14:45:04 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adam Lebor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">107292 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lord Ahmed backtracks on comments of Jewish conspiracy</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/107318/lord-ahmed-backtracks-comments-jewish-conspiracy</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Controversial peer Lord Ahmed’s attempted to rehabilitate his reputation with the Jewish community this week over remarks about a Jewish conspiracy he is said to have made.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Speaking ahead of his disciplinary hearing in front of the Labour Party national executive next week, the peer gave his version of the events which have led to his latest suspension from the party.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He acknowledged that he could not remember making the remarks, but apologised unreservedly and said he would be “utterly devastated” if it was proved that he had spoken in such terms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lord Ahmed was suspended by Labour in March after the &lt;i&gt;Times&lt;/i&gt; uncovered footage recorded in Pakistan in which he is said to have claimed - while speaking in Urdu - that Jewish lawyers and media were responsible for the length of a prison term he received for causing a fatal car crash. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He was jailed for 12 weeks for dangerous driving after a collision in 2007, in which a 28-year-old man was killed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 55-year-old Yorkshireman said he now wanted to repair his reputation and turn his attention to working with the Jewish community on matters of common interest to Muslims - kosher and halal meat, circumcision and burial. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But he also revealed that he may leave Labour before the hearing, complaining that he has not yet been presented with the video evidence the &lt;i&gt;Times&lt;/i&gt; used to compile its report. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“I’ve not made any decisions yet, but if I don’t have the evidence against me, why should I appear before them? Not being a Labour peer is something I am thinking about. I have been suspended twice before. Maybe it is time for me to move on somewhere else.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Following an interfaith event at the House of Lords on Tuesday, Lord Ahmed said: “I’m not saying that I’ve never made a mistake or I’ve never said something which might have been wrong and outrageous. I’ve always admitted when I’ve done it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“I do lots of interviews in Pakistan. I cannot recollect this particular one. It was straight after I came out of prison. I went to Pakistan to talk about the accident.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“I don’t keep copies of my interviews. I’m not a senior person. I’ve been very open and very naive. I’ve talked to people honestly and openly, sometimes controversially, about how I feel.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He admitted that his use of the word “yahoodi” – Urdu for “Jew” – in the interview was “outrageous”, but could offer no solid explanation of what was said, or why.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an attempt to clarify the situation,  he said: “People make mistakes, people say things… It wasn’t about the Jewish community. I unreservedly apologised for using that word. One reason is because there is no translation in Urdu of ‘Zionism’.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So had he intended to suggest his prison sentence was the result of a Zionist plot?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“No, I never said it was a plot. I have never said that at any time during my political life. It’s not what I believe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“I think what I’m saying to you is that in this context where I was reported to have been talking about pressure from the newspapers it could have been because of the accident. It was to do with my confused, bitter situation and being in prison and coming out. It was something I wanted to forget.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently his attention was  on attempting to clear his name over the “Jewish conspiracy” allegation. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“I would love to get to the bottom of it,” he said. “If I can see the film then we can put it to bed. I would be utterly devastated to know that I have said that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“The Labour Party hasn’t given me any evidence. If you are charging somebody it is their basic right to see the evidence against them. How can you defend yourself when you’ve not seen any evidence against you?” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;His initial apology to Labour leader Ed Miliband and the Jewish community over the matter was rejected by communal leaders in March. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lord Ahmed said: “I have not said anything directly against the [Jewish] community. I can’t go and address the Jewish Board of Deputies or the Community Security Trust because I don’t have any relationship with them and I’ve not said anything against them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“I have spoken to some of my colleagues here who are of the Jewish faith and said ‘help me put this record straight’. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“I’m trying my best to correct what was reported but I do realise that this is going to take a long time, to rebuild this trust and get back to the work I used to do before.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He added: “I don’t have a media advisor. I’m not a diplomatic person. Yorkshire people are very blunt in what they have to say. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;But I can say to you, on oath, that it is not the individual Jewish community [that I have any problem with]. From cradle to grave we have the same beliefs. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“I may have made mistakes, I’m sorry. I want to work with my faith communities where I have common things, about God, about the Prophets, about halal and kosher, about burial, about circumcision, about things we have in common. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“We will have political differences about Israel and Palestine, but not over the faith and communities. If that’s how it ever came out it was not how I intended it and I am sorry.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rabbi Mark Winer, a long-standing friend and former senior rabbi at the West London Synagogue, appeared alongside him at Tuesday’s Lords event. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He suggested Lord Ahmed may have made the remarks in a “moment of weakness”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“We all have our demons, of hatred and bigotry and sexism. I assumed he had said it. Lord Ahmed hasn’t asked me for help. I wrote to him and said ‘let’s get this straight’, because this isn’t the Nazir Ahmed I know. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“I have no problem acknowledging the possibility that he might have spoken badly. People are very confusing and very complex and I was willing to accept that from him.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rabbi Winer said because Lord Ahmed was Britain’s first male Muslim peer, people were “looking to knock him down”. He said he hoped his friend would not “take that bait” and walk away from politics.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news">UK news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/jewish-life">Jewish life</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/antisemitism">Antisemitism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/labour">Labour</category>
 <nid>107318</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 
 <caption>Lord Ahmed with Rabbi Mark Winer at the House of Lords (Photo: John Rifkin)</caption>
 <link1 />
 <link1_title />
 <link2 />
 <link2_title />
 <footer />
 <body>Controversial peer Lord Ahmed’s attempted to rehabilitate his reputation with the Jewish community this week over remarks about a Jewish conspiracy he is said to have made.
Speaking ahead of his disciplinary hearing in front of the Labour Party national executive next week, the peer gave his version of the events which have led to his latest suspension from the party.
He acknowledged that he could not remember making the remarks, but apologised unreservedly and said he would be “utterly devastated” if it was proved that he had spoken in such terms.
Lord Ahmed was suspended by Labour in March after the Times uncovered footage recorded in Pakistan in which he is said to have claimed - while speaking in Urdu - that Jewish lawyers and media were responsible for the length of a prison term he received for causing a fatal car crash. 
He was jailed for 12 weeks for dangerous driving after a collision in 2007, in which a 28-year-old man was killed.
The 55-year-old Yorkshireman said he now wanted to repair his reputation and turn his attention to working with the Jewish community on matters of common interest to Muslims - kosher and halal meat, circumcision and burial. 
But he also revealed that he may leave Labour before the hearing, complaining that he has not yet been presented with the video evidence the Times used to compile its report. 
“I’ve not made any decisions yet, but if I don’t have the evidence against me, why should I appear before them? Not being a Labour peer is something I am thinking about. I have been suspended twice before. Maybe it is time for me to move on somewhere else.”
Following an interfaith event at the House of Lords on Tuesday, Lord Ahmed said: “I’m not saying that I’ve never made a mistake or I’ve never said something which might have been wrong and outrageous. I’ve always admitted when I’ve done it.
“I do lots of interviews in Pakistan. I cannot recollect this particular one. It was straight after I came out of prison. I went to Pakistan to talk about the accident.
“I don’t keep copies of my interviews. I’m not a senior person. I’ve been very open and very naive. I’ve talked to people honestly and openly, sometimes controversially, about how I feel.”
He admitted that his use of the word “yahoodi” – Urdu for “Jew” – in the interview was “outrageous”, but could offer no solid explanation of what was said, or why.
In an attempt to clarify the situation,  he said: “People make mistakes, people say things… It wasn’t about the Jewish community. I unreservedly apologised for using that word. One reason is because there is no translation in Urdu of ‘Zionism’.”
So had he intended to suggest his prison sentence was the result of a Zionist plot?
“No, I never said it was a plot. I have never said that at any time during my political life. It’s not what I believe.
“I think what I’m saying to you is that in this context where I was reported to have been talking about pressure from the newspapers it could have been because of the accident. It was to do with my confused, bitter situation and being in prison and coming out. It was something I wanted to forget.”
Currently his attention was  on attempting to clear his name over the “Jewish conspiracy” allegation. 
“I would love to get to the bottom of it,” he said. “If I can see the film then we can put it to bed. I would be utterly devastated to know that I have said that.
“The Labour Party hasn’t given me any evidence. If you are charging somebody it is their basic right to see the evidence against them. How can you defend yourself when you’ve not seen any evidence against you?” 
His initial apology to Labour leader Ed Miliband and the Jewish community over the matter was rejected by communal leaders in March. 
Lord Ahmed said: “I have not said anything directly against the [Jewish] community. I can’t go and address the Jewish Board of Deputies or the Community Security Trust because I don’t have any relationship with them and I’ve not said anything against them.
“I have spoken to some of my colleagues here who are of the Jewish faith and said ‘help me put this record straight’. 
“I’m trying my best to correct what was reported but I do realise that this is going to take a long time, to rebuild this trust and get back to the work I used to do before.”
He added: “I don’t have a media advisor. I’m not a diplomatic person. Yorkshire people are very blunt in what they have to say. 
&quot;But I can say to you, on oath, that it is not the individual Jewish community [that I have any problem with]. From cradle to grave we have the same beliefs. 
“I may have made mistakes, I’m sorry. I want to work with my faith communities where I have common things, about God, about the Prophets, about halal and kosher, about burial, about circumcision, about things we have in common. 
“We will have political differences about Israel and Palestine, but not over the faith and communities. If that’s how it ever came out it was not how I intended it and I am sorry.”
Rabbi Mark Winer, a long-standing friend and former senior rabbi at the West London Synagogue, appeared alongside him at Tuesday’s Lords event. 
He suggested Lord Ahmed may have made the remarks in a “moment of weakness”.
“We all have our demons, of hatred and bigotry and sexism. I assumed he had said it. Lord Ahmed hasn’t asked me for help. I wrote to him and said ‘let’s get this straight’, because this isn’t the Nazir Ahmed I know. 
“I have no problem acknowledging the possibility that he might have spoken badly. People are very confusing and very complex and I was willing to accept that from him.”
Rabbi Winer said because Lord Ahmed was Britain’s first male Muslim peer, people were “looking to knock him down”. He said he hoped his friend would not “take that bait” and walk away from politics.</body>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 10:41:50 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Marcus Dysch</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">107318 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thriller based on real-life antisemitism </title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news/106887/thriller-based-real-life-antisemitism</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Could Germany ever have a Jewish chancellor? The notion may seem far-fetched, but it is the scenario that British writer and journalist David Crossland has concocted to convey his worries about antisemitism and xenophobia in modern Germany.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In The Jewish Candidate — an English-language thriller that is to be excerpted in Spiegel Online magazine and will be available as an e-book — Frank Carver, a reporter for the fictional ‘London Chronicle’, is sent to Germany cover Rudolf Gutman’s ground-breaking election campaign. Carver ends up uncovering a neo-Nazi plot to kill Gutman. And so the tale takes off. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, Mr Crossland hopes it will be a page-turner. But his motivations run deeper: he is profoundly critical of what he sees as Germany’s failure to confront its far-right.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The topic could hardly be more timely. Recently, German’s chief human rights officer, Markus Löning, apologised at the UN for mistakes in investigating a 10-year series of immigrant murders, calling it “one of the worst human rights violations in Germany in the last decade”. A trial involving the extremist National Socialist Union begins May 6 in Munich.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Germany “is trying to become a more normal country, but it has this problem which it has been ignoring for too long,” said Mr Crossland, 46, a political correspondent who also has covered the neo-Nazi scene. In areas of former East Germany, “you’ll have a problem if you don’t look German”, he added.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news">World news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/jewish-books">Jewish books</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/antisemitism">Antisemitism</category>
 <nid>106887</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 <image />
 <caption />
 <link1>102237</link1>
 <link1_title>Social media antisemitism is on the rise</link1_title>
 <link2>104992</link2>
 <link2_title>Survey: antisemitism rises 30 per cent worldwide</link2_title>
 <footer />
 <body>Could Germany ever have a Jewish chancellor? The notion may seem far-fetched, but it is the scenario that British writer and journalist David Crossland has concocted to convey his worries about antisemitism and xenophobia in modern Germany.
In The Jewish Candidate — an English-language thriller that is to be excerpted in Spiegel Online magazine and will be available as an e-book — Frank Carver, a reporter for the fictional ‘London Chronicle’, is sent to Germany cover Rudolf Gutman’s ground-breaking election campaign. Carver ends up uncovering a neo-Nazi plot to kill Gutman. And so the tale takes off. 
Of course, Mr Crossland hopes it will be a page-turner. But his motivations run deeper: he is profoundly critical of what he sees as Germany’s failure to confront its far-right.
The topic could hardly be more timely. Recently, German’s chief human rights officer, Markus Löning, apologised at the UN for mistakes in investigating a 10-year series of immigrant murders, calling it “one of the worst human rights violations in Germany in the last decade”. A trial involving the extremist National Socialist Union begins May 6 in Munich.
Germany “is trying to become a more normal country, but it has this problem which it has been ignoring for too long,” said Mr Crossland, 46, a political correspondent who also has covered the neo-Nazi scene. In areas of former East Germany, “you’ll have a problem if you don’t look German”, he added.</body>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 12:01:56 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Toby Axelrod</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">106887 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lord Ahmed &#039;will not get fair hearing&#039; claims lawyer</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/106973/lord-ahmed-will-not-get-fair-hearing-claims-lawyer</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The lawyer representing controversial peer Lord Ahmed has reportedly suggested his client will not get a fair hearing from Labour Party chiefs who are investigating claims that the peer made comments about a Jewish conspiracy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lord Ahmed will appear before a Labour National Executive Committee meeting on May 15. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He was suspended by the party in March after apparently claiming a Jewish conspiracy was responsible for his imprisonment for causing a fatal car crash.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;i&gt;Times&lt;/i&gt; obtained a recording of an interview the peer was said to have given in Pakistan, and reported his comments. Lord Ahmed is said to have claimed Jewish media owners pressured the courts to give him a severe punishment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;His solicitor, Stephen Smith, was quoted by the Blackburn-based newspaper &lt;i&gt;Asian Image&lt;/i&gt; as saying it was possible that footage of the interview had been doctored in Pakistan, as &quot;part of a dirty tricks campaign&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Smith reportedly said: &quot;Unfortunately there is no confirmation of the date of this so-called interview or where it is supposed to have taken place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;There is a translation of sorts with a number of words left out simply referred to as &#039;unintelligible&#039;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It appears that this is taken from a film which does not represent all of the interview and we believe it has been edited in such as way as to misrepresent what was actually said.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Smith was quoted as saying that he had not been able to obtain a copy of the interview film from Labour officials or the &lt;i&gt;Times&lt;/i&gt;, and that he had concluded: &quot;In my view the rules of natural justice require that this should be done to ensure that Lord Ahmed achieves a fair hearing, but the party does not appear to share that view.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last month Lord Ahmed said he had &quot;the greatest respect&quot; for the Jewish community and apologised to Labour leader Ed Miliband.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“He’s of the Jewish faith and I’m sorry that I embarrassed him, or anybody else in the Labour Party,” he said.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news">UK news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/antisemitism">Antisemitism</category>
 <nid>106973</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 
 <caption>Lord Ahmed</caption>
 <link1>103355</link1>
 <link1_title>Labour peer Lord Ahmed suspended over &#039;Jewish conspiracy&#039; claim</link1_title>
 <link2>104034</link2>
 <link2_title>Lord Ahmed apologises to the Jewish community </link2_title>
 <footer />
 <body>The lawyer representing controversial peer Lord Ahmed has reportedly suggested his client will not get a fair hearing from Labour Party chiefs who are investigating claims that the peer made comments about a Jewish conspiracy.
Lord Ahmed will appear before a Labour National Executive Committee meeting on May 15. 
He was suspended by the party in March after apparently claiming a Jewish conspiracy was responsible for his imprisonment for causing a fatal car crash.
The Times obtained a recording of an interview the peer was said to have given in Pakistan, and reported his comments. Lord Ahmed is said to have claimed Jewish media owners pressured the courts to give him a severe punishment.
His solicitor, Stephen Smith, was quoted by the Blackburn-based newspaper Asian Image as saying it was possible that footage of the interview had been doctored in Pakistan, as &quot;part of a dirty tricks campaign&quot;.
Mr Smith reportedly said: &quot;Unfortunately there is no confirmation of the date of this so-called interview or where it is supposed to have taken place.
&quot;There is a translation of sorts with a number of words left out simply referred to as &#039;unintelligible&#039;. 
&quot;It appears that this is taken from a film which does not represent all of the interview and we believe it has been edited in such as way as to misrepresent what was actually said.&quot; 
Mr Smith was quoted as saying that he had not been able to obtain a copy of the interview film from Labour officials or the Times, and that he had concluded: &quot;In my view the rules of natural justice require that this should be done to ensure that Lord Ahmed achieves a fair hearing, but the party does not appear to share that view.&quot;
Last month Lord Ahmed said he had &quot;the greatest respect&quot; for the Jewish community and apologised to Labour leader Ed Miliband.
“He’s of the Jewish faith and I’m sorry that I embarrassed him, or anybody else in the Labour Party,” he said.</body>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 13:31:13 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Marcus Dysch</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">106973 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
