<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thejc.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>USA</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/usa-0</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>US considering arming rebels in Syria — despite Israeli warnings</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news/106945/us-considering-arming-rebels-syria-%E2%80%94-despite-israeli-warnings</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;for the first time, the US is considering arming rebel groups in Syria.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;America’s toughening stance on the issue follows the reported use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a press briefing on Tuesday, President Barack Obama warned against “rushing to judgment without hard effective evidence”. However, administration officials acknowledged that the information received so far was sufficient for the Pentagon to prepare options including supplying the rebels with arms. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Obama administration has been blamed for being slow to react to the rapidly developing situation in Syria and even for downplaying evidence of chemical-weapons use, but a spokesperson for the US National Security Council said this week: “Assistance to the Syrian opposition has been on an upward trajectory.” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Israel has warned that arms supplied to the rebel groups could ultimately be used against Israeli and Western targets. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In another development, Hizbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah made a speech in which he admitted for the first time that members of his movement were fighting alongside Assad’s forces in Syria. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While there have been widespread reports of large numbers of Hizbollah fighters in many areas of Syria, Nasrallah had insisted that they had only entered the country to protect Lebanese citizens living in border towns. But Nasrallah warned of a more robust involvement when he said that “Syria has real friends in the region, and the world, who will not let Syria fall into the hands of America, Israel or Takfiri [extreme jihadist] groups. They will not let this happen.” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, senior Israeli officials have admitted that a lecture by Brigadier-General Itai Brun, commander of the IDF’s Military Intelligence Research Division, in which he announced that Israel believed that Syria had used sarin gas against the rebels, was not cleared first with any civilian official outside the IDF. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“We certainly are not looking to create a dispute here with the US,” said one defence source. “Brun should not have made it look as if Israel is challenging Obama to do something in Syria.” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Israel’s main concern over Syria remains the potential transfer of advanced weapons, including chemical ones, to Hizbollah in Lebanon. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In January, Israel attacked a convoy of advanced anti-aircraft missiles bound for Lebanon, although reports early this week of an Israeli attack on a Syrian chemical weapons base appear to be unfounded. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A large-scale exercise carried out by thousands of reserve soldiers by the IDF in the north of Israel this week fuelled rumours of an operation in Lebanon or Syria, but the exercise had been planned many months in advance. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Israeli officials stressed that, while the IDF would have to act immediately if chemical weapons were being transferred to Hizbollah, the policy is to try to contain the situation in Syria. The chances of succeeding, however, are diminishing by the day.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news">World news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/usa-0">USA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/syria">Syria</category>
 <nid>106945</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 
 <caption>A Hizbollah-backed fighter patrols the Syria-Lebanon border</caption>
 <link1>106636</link1>
 <link1_title>Israel&#039;s warning over Syria chemical weapons</link1_title>
 <link2>106480</link2>
 <link2_title>Israeli &#039;red lines&#039; being crossed in Syria and Iran</link2_title>
 <footer />
 <body>for the first time, the US is considering arming rebel groups in Syria.  
America’s toughening stance on the issue follows the reported use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime. 
In a press briefing on Tuesday, President Barack Obama warned against “rushing to judgment without hard effective evidence”. However, administration officials acknowledged that the information received so far was sufficient for the Pentagon to prepare options including supplying the rebels with arms. 
The Obama administration has been blamed for being slow to react to the rapidly developing situation in Syria and even for downplaying evidence of chemical-weapons use, but a spokesperson for the US National Security Council said this week: “Assistance to the Syrian opposition has been on an upward trajectory.” 
Israel has warned that arms supplied to the rebel groups could ultimately be used against Israeli and Western targets. 
In another development, Hizbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah made a speech in which he admitted for the first time that members of his movement were fighting alongside Assad’s forces in Syria. 
While there have been widespread reports of large numbers of Hizbollah fighters in many areas of Syria, Nasrallah had insisted that they had only entered the country to protect Lebanese citizens living in border towns. But Nasrallah warned of a more robust involvement when he said that “Syria has real friends in the region, and the world, who will not let Syria fall into the hands of America, Israel or Takfiri [extreme jihadist] groups. They will not let this happen.” 
Meanwhile, senior Israeli officials have admitted that a lecture by Brigadier-General Itai Brun, commander of the IDF’s Military Intelligence Research Division, in which he announced that Israel believed that Syria had used sarin gas against the rebels, was not cleared first with any civilian official outside the IDF. 
“We certainly are not looking to create a dispute here with the US,” said one defence source. “Brun should not have made it look as if Israel is challenging Obama to do something in Syria.” 
Israel’s main concern over Syria remains the potential transfer of advanced weapons, including chemical ones, to Hizbollah in Lebanon. 
In January, Israel attacked a convoy of advanced anti-aircraft missiles bound for Lebanon, although reports early this week of an Israeli attack on a Syrian chemical weapons base appear to be unfounded. 
A large-scale exercise carried out by thousands of reserve soldiers by the IDF in the north of Israel this week fuelled rumours of an operation in Lebanon or Syria, but the exercise had been planned many months in advance. 
Israeli officials stressed that, while the IDF would have to act immediately if chemical weapons were being transferred to Hizbollah, the policy is to try to contain the situation in Syria. The chances of succeeding, however, are diminishing by the day.</body>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 14:00:44 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anshel Pfeffer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">106945 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Israel welcomes Arab League shift on peace talks</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/israel-news/106848/israel-welcomes-arab-league-shift-peace-talks</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Israeli Prime Minister’s Office has “welcomed” the Arab League’s new positioning on peace talks with Israel.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim al-Thani announced that the Arab League backed minor land swaps after an Arab delegation met US Secretary of State John Kerry in Washington on Monday. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Bahraini, Egyptian and Jordanian foreign ministers were at the meeting, as well as officials from Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, the Palestinian Authority and the Arab League.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The announcement marked a shift from the Arab Peace Initiative in 2002, which asked for a return to 1967 borders, the inclusion of East Jerusalem in a Palestinian state and the return of Palestinian refugees, in exchange for a full Arab recognition of Israel.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Kerry told a news conference that his meeting with the Arab League was “a very big step forward.” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He said: “We’re going to continue to march forward and try to bring people to the table despite the difficulties and the disappointments of the past.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“So the Arab community - and I think they should be thanked for this - saw fit to come here to the United States as a delegation of the Arab League to make it clear that they are relaunching the Arab Peace Initiative,” he added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Israel’s Prime Minister’s Office “welcomed the support given by the Arab league delegation and the US Secretary of State to the diplomatic process.” The office said it is prepared to negotiate with the Palestinians immediately.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Israel President Shimon Peres said that the announcement means that “a broad structure of support is being created for making progress” and that “there is a chance to open negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Israel’s Justice Minister Tzipi Livni hailed it as “a message to the Israeli public that this is not just about us and the Palestinians.” She told Israeli Army Radio on Tuesday that the agreement “allows the Palestinians to enter the room and make the needed compromises.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All 52 opposition members of the Knesset have signed a petition asking Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to address parliament on the Arab League announcement.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/israel-news">Israel news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/usa-0">USA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/peace-process">Peace process</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/palestinians">Palestinians</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/arabs">Arabs</category>
 <nid>106848</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 
 <caption>Jerusalem (Photo: Tsvika Sion)</caption>
 <link1>105974</link1>
 <link1_title>Peace frozen on Kerry-go-round</link1_title>
 <link2>104933</link2>
 <link2_title>Kerry arrives in Israel to kick-start peace process</link2_title>
 <footer />
 <body>The Israeli Prime Minister’s Office has “welcomed” the Arab League’s new positioning on peace talks with Israel.
Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim al-Thani announced that the Arab League backed minor land swaps after an Arab delegation met US Secretary of State John Kerry in Washington on Monday. 
The Bahraini, Egyptian and Jordanian foreign ministers were at the meeting, as well as officials from Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, the Palestinian Authority and the Arab League.
The announcement marked a shift from the Arab Peace Initiative in 2002, which asked for a return to 1967 borders, the inclusion of East Jerusalem in a Palestinian state and the return of Palestinian refugees, in exchange for a full Arab recognition of Israel.
Mr Kerry told a news conference that his meeting with the Arab League was “a very big step forward.” 
He said: “We’re going to continue to march forward and try to bring people to the table despite the difficulties and the disappointments of the past.”
“So the Arab community - and I think they should be thanked for this - saw fit to come here to the United States as a delegation of the Arab League to make it clear that they are relaunching the Arab Peace Initiative,” he added.
Israel’s Prime Minister’s Office “welcomed the support given by the Arab league delegation and the US Secretary of State to the diplomatic process.” The office said it is prepared to negotiate with the Palestinians immediately.
Israel President Shimon Peres said that the announcement means that “a broad structure of support is being created for making progress” and that “there is a chance to open negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.”
Israel’s Justice Minister Tzipi Livni hailed it as “a message to the Israeli public that this is not just about us and the Palestinians.” She told Israeli Army Radio on Tuesday that the agreement “allows the Palestinians to enter the room and make the needed compromises.”
All 52 opposition members of the Knesset have signed a petition asking Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to address parliament on the Arab League announcement.</body>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 10:37:53 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zoe Winograd</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">106848 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>US-Israel ties factor in Boston bombing, says UN man</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news/106337/us-israel-ties-factor-boston-bombing-says-un-man</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;United Nations Human Rights official Richard Falk has picked out America’s relationship with Israel as one of the factors that create &quot;blowbacks&quot; such as the Boston bombing. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In his foreign policy journal article titled, ‘A Commentary on the Marathon Murders’, Mr Falk wrote: “As long as Tel Aviv has the compliant ear of the American political establishment, those who wish for peace and justice in the world should not rest easy.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Falk included America’s foreign policy since the 9/11 attacks as well as “a series of disappointing reactions by Obama” as explanations for the recent Boston violence in which three people were killed. Mr Falk criticised Barack Obama’s approach to the Middle East and “the strong pushback by Israel and its belligerent leader, Bibi Netanyahu.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Falk, who is the UN Human Rights Council’s permanent investigator into Israel’s violations of international law, predicted further violence in the future. He wrote: “The United States has been fortunate not to experience worse blowbacks, and these may yet happen, especially if there is no disposition to rethink US relations to others in the world, starting with the Middle East.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news">World news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/united-nations">United Nations</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/usa-0">USA</category>
 <nid>106337</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 <image />
 <caption />
 <link1>38675</link1>
 <link1_title>Israel condemned by United Nations</link1_title>
 <link2>105833</link2>
 <link2_title>Israelis helped prepare Boston hospital for mass-casualty event</link2_title>
 <footer />
 <body>United Nations Human Rights official Richard Falk has picked out America’s relationship with Israel as one of the factors that create &quot;blowbacks&quot; such as the Boston bombing. 
In his foreign policy journal article titled, ‘A Commentary on the Marathon Murders’, Mr Falk wrote: “As long as Tel Aviv has the compliant ear of the American political establishment, those who wish for peace and justice in the world should not rest easy.”
Mr Falk included America’s foreign policy since the 9/11 attacks as well as “a series of disappointing reactions by Obama” as explanations for the recent Boston violence in which three people were killed. Mr Falk criticised Barack Obama’s approach to the Middle East and “the strong pushback by Israel and its belligerent leader, Bibi Netanyahu.”
Mr Falk, who is the UN Human Rights Council’s permanent investigator into Israel’s violations of international law, predicted further violence in the future. He wrote: “The United States has been fortunate not to experience worse blowbacks, and these may yet happen, especially if there is no disposition to rethink US relations to others in the world, starting with the Middle East.”</body>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:54:42 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zoe Winograd</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">106337 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Peace frozen on Kerry-go-round</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/comment-and-debate/analysis/105974/peace-frozen-kerry-go-round</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Unsurprisingly, it didn’t take Israelis and Palestinians long to declare with conviction that US Secretary of State John Kerry’s first “shuttle” trip to the region had failed. Conditions are “unacceptable” and the “obstacles are too big.” And this was before either was asked to do the fundamentally reasonable thing: compare maps delineating the two-state model.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Welcome to the wonderful, bizarre, smoke-and-mirrors world of Middle East peace-making, Mr Secretary. Get used to it; it won’t get better.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Kerry had barely left the region en route to China to focus on the brewing North Korea crisis, and a chorus of Israelis and Palestinians knew for a fact that many of his suggestions, ideas and policy options were non-starters. Been there, never done that. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To a degree, they are tragically right. After all, if the Clinton Parameters of Camp David 2000, enunciated by former US President Bill Clinton in January 2001 or the Olmert-Abbas understandings of 2008 are not enough, how can anything Mr Kerry proposes or discusses be acceptable? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Israel, under the current government, would like to ignore both sets of principles when negotiating a final-status deal. The Palestinians cannot endorse this, since the accords are, in their perception, solid terms of reference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Palestinians, after refusing the Camp David deal, demand to go further than Olmert-Abbas. This is unacceptable to Israel not only because of the predominant right-wing nature of the government or Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s distaste for, and suspicion of, the two-state solution, but also and primarily because Hamas, and not the Palestinian Authority, controls Gaza.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Given these two irreconcilable approaches, it is almost impossible to imagine a grand deal. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But Mr Kerry is optimistic that some form of a process with tangible and achievable short-term goals can be launched despite reluctance on both sides, political instability and upheaval in the Palestinian Authority and a patently right-wing government in Israel.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Kerry reportedly indicated two important time frames for progress: He will travel to the region every few weeks and aim for an Israeli-Palestinian-Jordanian mini-summit in the upcoming weeks, perhaps with indirect involvement by Turkey. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondly, he has allotted a six-month period to decide whether sufficient common ground has been reached to warrant presidential involvement. If there are positive indications, Mr Kerry will then approach US President Barack Obama and seek his commitment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Herein lies the key question: how involved will Mr Obama become? Will he be convinced that a deal can be reached and craft a presidential initiative, or will he allow Mr Kerry to play peace-maker and remain focused on the more pressing foreign-policy priorities in east Asia, not to mention his domestic agenda?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If Mr Kerry fails, it may be well into the next president’s term, circa 2018, when the US re-engages with the Israeli-Palestinian quagmire. By 2018, another development may affect US policy: At that point, the US will be very close to attaining total energy independence, certainly from Middle Eastern oil. Israel and the Palestinians, with all their grievances, justifiable apprehensions and past peace-process meltdowns must take this into account or pay a very high price.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It should be clear by now to any observer of this conflict and conflict-resolution saga that, left to their own devices, at this point in history, Israel and the Palestinians are eminently incapable of reaching a deal through bilateral negotiations. The level of distrust, disillusionment and suspicion is just too high. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Furthermore, and beyond the empty rhetoric of “our hand is extended and we will take risks for peace,” both have developed a mirror-image posture based on a disincentive to reach a deal. The stakes are too high, the intangibles too many and the political cost too expensive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In six months or so, Mr Kerry may conclude that if time is not of the essence to Israel and the Palestinians, then surely wasting time is of the utmost essence for him personally and for US foreign policy in general.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Until then, Mr Kerry will presumably try to work out deal that establishes a provisional (demilitarized) Palestinian state on, say, 60 per cent of the West Bank, backed by a Security Council resolution that contains mutual recognition. The Palestinians would recognise Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people, and Israel would recognise the state of Palestine, whose final borders will be demarcated within five years. In order to achieve this, Mr Kerry will need Saudi, Jordanian and even Egyptian backing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a precarious tipping point. Neither side can conceivably agree to the other’s map. Israel will have to dismantle settlements, not just illegal outposts, or pledge to do so within the five-year period. A Netanyahu-led government will not do this. The Palestinians will have to be content with a mini-state, defer “core” issues and pledge to extend their rule to Gaza. They cannot do so.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When Kerry tires of his shuttle diplomacy, his best bet may instead be to send Dennis Rodman, fresh from his public-relations stunt in North Korea, who will at least have the capacity to shock and entertain while taking on a hopeless cause.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/comment-and-debate/analysis">Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/palestinians">Palestinians</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/israel">Israel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/usa-0">USA</category>
 <nid>105974</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 <image />
 <caption />
 <link1>105304</link1>
 <link1_title>Good luck, Mr Kerry, the two sides remain divided</link1_title>
 <link2>104933</link2>
 <link2_title>Kerry arrives in Israel to kick-start peace process</link2_title>
 <footer>Ambassador Alon Pinkas was Israel’s consul general in New York, adviser to Shimon Peres and chief of staff to Ehud Barak and Shlomo Ben Ami. He is currently a fellow at the Israel Policy Forum (IPF).</footer>
 <body>Unsurprisingly, it didn’t take Israelis and Palestinians long to declare with conviction that US Secretary of State John Kerry’s first “shuttle” trip to the region had failed. Conditions are “unacceptable” and the “obstacles are too big.” And this was before either was asked to do the fundamentally reasonable thing: compare maps delineating the two-state model.
Welcome to the wonderful, bizarre, smoke-and-mirrors world of Middle East peace-making, Mr Secretary. Get used to it; it won’t get better.
Mr Kerry had barely left the region en route to China to focus on the brewing North Korea crisis, and a chorus of Israelis and Palestinians knew for a fact that many of his suggestions, ideas and policy options were non-starters. Been there, never done that. 
To a degree, they are tragically right. After all, if the Clinton Parameters of Camp David 2000, enunciated by former US President Bill Clinton in January 2001 or the Olmert-Abbas understandings of 2008 are not enough, how can anything Mr Kerry proposes or discusses be acceptable? 
Israel, under the current government, would like to ignore both sets of principles when negotiating a final-status deal. The Palestinians cannot endorse this, since the accords are, in their perception, solid terms of reference.
The Palestinians, after refusing the Camp David deal, demand to go further than Olmert-Abbas. This is unacceptable to Israel not only because of the predominant right-wing nature of the government or Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s distaste for, and suspicion of, the two-state solution, but also and primarily because Hamas, and not the Palestinian Authority, controls Gaza.
Given these two irreconcilable approaches, it is almost impossible to imagine a grand deal. 
But Mr Kerry is optimistic that some form of a process with tangible and achievable short-term goals can be launched despite reluctance on both sides, political instability and upheaval in the Palestinian Authority and a patently right-wing government in Israel.
Mr Kerry reportedly indicated two important time frames for progress: He will travel to the region every few weeks and aim for an Israeli-Palestinian-Jordanian mini-summit in the upcoming weeks, perhaps with indirect involvement by Turkey. 
Secondly, he has allotted a six-month period to decide whether sufficient common ground has been reached to warrant presidential involvement. If there are positive indications, Mr Kerry will then approach US President Barack Obama and seek his commitment.
Herein lies the key question: how involved will Mr Obama become? Will he be convinced that a deal can be reached and craft a presidential initiative, or will he allow Mr Kerry to play peace-maker and remain focused on the more pressing foreign-policy priorities in east Asia, not to mention his domestic agenda?
If Mr Kerry fails, it may be well into the next president’s term, circa 2018, when the US re-engages with the Israeli-Palestinian quagmire. By 2018, another development may affect US policy: At that point, the US will be very close to attaining total energy independence, certainly from Middle Eastern oil. Israel and the Palestinians, with all their grievances, justifiable apprehensions and past peace-process meltdowns must take this into account or pay a very high price.
It should be clear by now to any observer of this conflict and conflict-resolution saga that, left to their own devices, at this point in history, Israel and the Palestinians are eminently incapable of reaching a deal through bilateral negotiations. The level of distrust, disillusionment and suspicion is just too high. 
Furthermore, and beyond the empty rhetoric of “our hand is extended and we will take risks for peace,” both have developed a mirror-image posture based on a disincentive to reach a deal. The stakes are too high, the intangibles too many and the political cost too expensive.
In six months or so, Mr Kerry may conclude that if time is not of the essence to Israel and the Palestinians, then surely wasting time is of the utmost essence for him personally and for US foreign policy in general.
Until then, Mr Kerry will presumably try to work out deal that establishes a provisional (demilitarized) Palestinian state on, say, 60 per cent of the West Bank, backed by a Security Council resolution that contains mutual recognition. The Palestinians would recognise Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people, and Israel would recognise the state of Palestine, whose final borders will be demarcated within five years. In order to achieve this, Mr Kerry will need Saudi, Jordanian and even Egyptian backing.
This is a precarious tipping point. Neither side can conceivably agree to the other’s map. Israel will have to dismantle settlements, not just illegal outposts, or pledge to do so within the five-year period. A Netanyahu-led government will not do this. The Palestinians will have to be content with a mini-state, defer “core” issues and pledge to extend their rule to Gaza. They cannot do so.
When Kerry tires of his shuttle diplomacy, his best bet may instead be to send Dennis Rodman, fresh from his public-relations stunt in North Korea, who will at least have the capacity to shock and entertain while taking on a hopeless cause.</body>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:40:38 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alon Pinkas</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">105974 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>US Senate pledges military backing for Israel over Iran</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news/105948/us-senate-pledges-military-backing-israel-over-iran</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The US Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee has passed a resolution to support Israel if a conflict with Iran arises.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Resolution 65, sponsored by Senator Robert Menendez and Senator Lindsey Graham, was voted on by the Senate on Tuesday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to the US congressional website, the resolution states: &quot;If the government of Israel is compelled to take military action in legitimate self-defence against Iran’s nuclear weapons programme, the United States government should stand with Israel and provide, in accordance with United States law and the constitutional responsibility of Congress to authorise the use of military force, diplomatic, military, and economic support to the government of Israel in its defense of its territory, people, and existence.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, the Times of Israel has reported that Iran has tripled its nuclear weapon programme in the last three months.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news">World news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/usa-0">USA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/iran">Iran</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/israel">Israel</category>
 <nid>105948</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 
 <caption>US President Barack Obama</caption>
 <link1>105310</link1>
 <link1_title>US policy on Iran is not working</link1_title>
 <link2>98713</link2>
 <link2_title>Iran sanctions are stepped up</link2_title>
 <footer />
 <body>The US Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee has passed a resolution to support Israel if a conflict with Iran arises.
Resolution 65, sponsored by Senator Robert Menendez and Senator Lindsey Graham, was voted on by the Senate on Tuesday.
According to the US congressional website, the resolution states: &quot;If the government of Israel is compelled to take military action in legitimate self-defence against Iran’s nuclear weapons programme, the United States government should stand with Israel and provide, in accordance with United States law and the constitutional responsibility of Congress to authorise the use of military force, diplomatic, military, and economic support to the government of Israel in its defense of its territory, people, and existence.&quot; 
Meanwhile, the Times of Israel has reported that Iran has tripled its nuclear weapon programme in the last three months.</body>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:01:24 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zoe Winograd</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">105948 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>US cemetery director looted tombstone cash</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news/105939/us-cemetery-director-looted-tombstone-cash</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;An American Jewish cemetery director has pleaded guilty to stealing $1 million from her institution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ilana Friedman, 51, had been pocketing money from bereaved families, causing losses to Staten Island’s Jewish cemetery of over $850,000 between 2005 and 2011.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Brooklyn resident, who co-directed the United Hebrew Cemetery for 15 years with husband Arthur Friedman, pleaded guilty to grand larceny in Staten Island Criminal Court today.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Under a settlement, Mr and Mrs Friedman must pay $1 million in stolen funds to the cemetery and may never work in the funeral or cemetery industry. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman found that Mrs Friedman had also been using fees for headstones and plots on personal expenses such as dinners, jewellery and theatre tickets.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news">World news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/usa-0">USA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/crime">Crime</category>
 <nid>105939</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 <image />
 <caption />
 <link1>47282</link1>
 <link1_title>Metal thieves hit cemetery in Blackpool</link1_title>
 <link2>68855</link2>
 <link2_title>Copper theft delays cemetery improvements</link2_title>
 <footer />
 <body>An American Jewish cemetery director has pleaded guilty to stealing $1 million from her institution.
Ilana Friedman, 51, had been pocketing money from bereaved families, causing losses to Staten Island’s Jewish cemetery of over $850,000 between 2005 and 2011.
The Brooklyn resident, who co-directed the United Hebrew Cemetery for 15 years with husband Arthur Friedman, pleaded guilty to grand larceny in Staten Island Criminal Court today.
Under a settlement, Mr and Mrs Friedman must pay $1 million in stolen funds to the cemetery and may never work in the funeral or cemetery industry. 
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman found that Mrs Friedman had also been using fees for headstones and plots on personal expenses such as dinners, jewellery and theatre tickets.</body>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:00:31 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zoe Winograd</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">105939 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Israelis helped prepare Boston hospital for mass-casualty event</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news/105833/israelis-helped-prepare-boston-hospital-mass-casualty-event</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;An Israeli team has been credited for having prepared the Massachusetts General Hospital for the current influx of victims of the Boston marathon bombing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seventeen critically injured people are being treated at the hospital after two explosions in downtown Boston on Tuesday afternoon. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alastair Conn, Chief of Emergency Services at Massachusetts General Hospital told reporters: “About two years ago in actual fact we asked the Israelis to come across and they helped us set up our disaster team so that we could respond in this manner.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to the Algemeiner, when Dr Conn was asked about the explosions, “Would you characterise these as almost something you would see in a military setting?”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He responded: “Absolutely, this is like a bomb explosion that we hear about in the news in Baghdad, or Israel or some other tragic place in the world.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the latest count, the attacks have killed three and injured 140.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The two devices exploded amongst spectators near the finish line.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rabbi Mayer Zarchi from Boston Chabad synagogue was at the scene. He said: “People just started running away from the centre, from the finish line.” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“I’ve never seen anything like this before – the nature of the carnage, you can’t really articulate it in words. It was unreal.” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Abraham Foxman ADL National Director said in a statement: “Like all Americans, we were deeply shocked by the apparent bombing of the Boston Marathon.  It is sad that any time a bomb explodes in public place we are conditioned as a first reflex to think of it as a terrorist attack; but unfortunately, in this instance it appears that our fears have been realised.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When asked whether it was a terrorist attack, Boston Police commissioner Ed Davis told reporters: &quot;We&#039;re not being definitive about this right now, but you can reach your own conclusions based on what happened.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At a briefing at the White House, US President Barack Obama said: &quot;The American people will say a prayer for Boston tonight. Michelle and I send our deepest thoughts and prayers to the families of the victims in the wake of this senseless loss.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We will find out who did this and we will hold them accountable,&quot; he said. &quot;Make no mistake, we will find out who did this and why they did this, and the groups or individuals responsible will feel the full weight of justice.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news">World news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/usa-0">USA</category>
 <nid>105833</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 
 <caption>The finish line of the Boston marathon before the explosions (Photo: hatonga)</caption>
 <link1>94683</link1>
 <link1_title>Bomb threat to LA synagogue</link1_title>
 <link2>101965</link2>
 <link2_title>Suicide bomber blast at US embassy in Turkey </link2_title>
 <footer />
 <body>An Israeli team has been credited for having prepared the Massachusetts General Hospital for the current influx of victims of the Boston marathon bombing.
Seventeen critically injured people are being treated at the hospital after two explosions in downtown Boston on Tuesday afternoon. 
Alastair Conn, Chief of Emergency Services at Massachusetts General Hospital told reporters: “About two years ago in actual fact we asked the Israelis to come across and they helped us set up our disaster team so that we could respond in this manner.”
According to the Algemeiner, when Dr Conn was asked about the explosions, “Would you characterise these as almost something you would see in a military setting?”
He responded: “Absolutely, this is like a bomb explosion that we hear about in the news in Baghdad, or Israel or some other tragic place in the world.”
At the latest count, the attacks have killed three and injured 140.
The two devices exploded amongst spectators near the finish line.
Rabbi Mayer Zarchi from Boston Chabad synagogue was at the scene. He said: “People just started running away from the centre, from the finish line.” 
“I’ve never seen anything like this before – the nature of the carnage, you can’t really articulate it in words. It was unreal.” 
Abraham Foxman ADL National Director said in a statement: “Like all Americans, we were deeply shocked by the apparent bombing of the Boston Marathon.  It is sad that any time a bomb explodes in public place we are conditioned as a first reflex to think of it as a terrorist attack; but unfortunately, in this instance it appears that our fears have been realised.”
When asked whether it was a terrorist attack, Boston Police commissioner Ed Davis told reporters: &quot;We&#039;re not being definitive about this right now, but you can reach your own conclusions based on what happened.&quot;
At a briefing at the White House, US President Barack Obama said: &quot;The American people will say a prayer for Boston tonight. Michelle and I send our deepest thoughts and prayers to the families of the victims in the wake of this senseless loss.&quot;
&quot;We will find out who did this and we will hold them accountable,&quot; he said. &quot;Make no mistake, we will find out who did this and why they did this, and the groups or individuals responsible will feel the full weight of justice.&quot;</body>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:38:57 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zoe Winograd</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">105833 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>US and Europe act to prevent resignation of Fayyad</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/israel-news/105521/us-and-europe-act-prevent-resignation-fayyad</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;American and European officials have asked Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to postpone a meeting with Prime Minister Salam Fayyad which was meant to take place today.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is believed that Mr Abbas wanted to discuss the possibility of Mr Fayyad leaving the government.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to sources, Mr Fayyad may have resigned following a disagreement with Mr Abbas over the departure of finance minister Nabil Qassis. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It remains unclear whether Mr Fayyad officially handed in his letter of resignation: some sources have reported that Mr Abbas fired Mr Fayyad. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The historically unstable PA has a track record of resignations that never materialised.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The US and European Union are eager to keep Mr Fayyad in his role while US Secretary of State John Kerry tries to facilitate negotiations between the Palestinians and Israelis. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A senior diplomat in Jerusalem told Ha’aretz: &quot;Fayyad&#039;s departure would have a serious impact on relations with the international community.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Kerry met Mr Fayyad in Jerusalem during his shuttle diplomacy visit to Israel this week. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/israel-news">Israel news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/mahmoud-abbas">Mahmoud Abbas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/usa-0">USA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/palestinian-authority">Palestinian Authority</category>
 <nid>105521</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 <image />
 <caption />
 <link1>105360</link1>
 <link1_title>PA Prime Minister Salam Fayyad to resign Reuters reported</link1_title>
 <link2>64405</link2>
 <link2_title>Fayyad warns of new intifada</link2_title>
 <footer />
 <body>American and European officials have asked Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to postpone a meeting with Prime Minister Salam Fayyad which was meant to take place today.
It is believed that Mr Abbas wanted to discuss the possibility of Mr Fayyad leaving the government.
According to sources, Mr Fayyad may have resigned following a disagreement with Mr Abbas over the departure of finance minister Nabil Qassis. 
It remains unclear whether Mr Fayyad officially handed in his letter of resignation: some sources have reported that Mr Abbas fired Mr Fayyad. 
The historically unstable PA has a track record of resignations that never materialised.
The US and European Union are eager to keep Mr Fayyad in his role while US Secretary of State John Kerry tries to facilitate negotiations between the Palestinians and Israelis. 
A senior diplomat in Jerusalem told Ha’aretz: &quot;Fayyad&#039;s departure would have a serious impact on relations with the international community.&quot;
Mr Kerry met Mr Fayyad in Jerusalem during his shuttle diplomacy visit to Israel this week. </body>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:03:00 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zoe Winograd</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">105521 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fake rabbi sent to jail</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news/105467/fake-rabbi-sent-jail</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A New York immigration lawyer who pretended to be a rabbi has been sentenced to four years in jail.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Earl Seth David, 49, known as Rabbi Avraham David, used the title of rabbi for 13 years to gain the trust of US immigrants looking to bid for naturalisation. According to sources, David pocketed up to $30,000 per case to forge false immigration papers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The lawyer fled to Canada in 2006 after his law firm was put under investigation. David was extradited to the US on Wednesday where he appeared in a New York court and pleaded not guilty to charges of conspiracy to commit immigration fraud, making false statements to immigration authorities and money laundering. He was sentenced to four years in jail and forced to pay $2.5 million in damages.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 2003 David wrote a book titled ‘Code of the heart’ under the name Rabbi Avraham David which gave predictions about the future based on the Bible. According to Federal prosecutors, David used the name of the book as the name of his bank account in the US and Canada to profit from the immigration scam.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news">World news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/crime">Crime</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/usa-0">USA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/rabbis">Rabbis</category>
 <nid>105467</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap />
 
 <caption>New York lawyer sentenced to jail (Photo: Erik Daniel Drost)</caption>
 <link1>105318</link1>
 <link1_title>Plagiarism by chief rabbi shocks France</link1_title>
 <link2>103412</link2>
 <link2_title>Death of controversial Manchester rabbi</link2_title>
 <footer />
 <body>A New York immigration lawyer who pretended to be a rabbi has been sentenced to four years in jail.
Earl Seth David, 49, known as Rabbi Avraham David, used the title of rabbi for 13 years to gain the trust of US immigrants looking to bid for naturalisation. According to sources, David pocketed up to $30,000 per case to forge false immigration papers.
The lawyer fled to Canada in 2006 after his law firm was put under investigation. David was extradited to the US on Wednesday where he appeared in a New York court and pleaded not guilty to charges of conspiracy to commit immigration fraud, making false statements to immigration authorities and money laundering. He was sentenced to four years in jail and forced to pay $2.5 million in damages.
In 2003 David wrote a book titled ‘Code of the heart’ under the name Rabbi Avraham David which gave predictions about the future based on the Bible. According to Federal prosecutors, David used the name of the book as the name of his bank account in the US and Canada to profit from the immigration scam.</body>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:53:47 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zoe Winograd</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">105467 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Good luck, Mr Kerry, the two sides remain divided</title>
 <link>http://www.thejc.com/news/israel-news/105304/good-luck-mr-kerry-two-sides-remain-divided</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;American Secretary of State John Kerry sounded hopeful this week when he tried to relaunch the peace process between the Israelis and Palestinians — but it seems that so far he has only succeeded in highlighting the distance between the two sides and major differences within the Israeli cabinet. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Kerry, who was on a 48-hour visit to the region earlier this week to Jerusalem and Ramallah, where he held talks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, has been trying to capitalise on US President Barack Obama’s successful visit to Israel three weeks ago. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an upbeat address to American diplomatic staff in Jerusalem, he said that while the Israel-Palestine conflict is “the biggest, the longest, the most complicated and the most vexing” of global conflicts, he would not be back for his “multiple-whatever-umpteenth trip” if he did not believe that America could bring the sides together and encourage them to find a peaceful resolution to their disputes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the absence of a foreign minister, there is no clear Israeli representative now leading the government’s diplomatic effort. Justice Minister Tzipi Livni has also been appointed to lead negotiations with the Palestinian Authority but she is to be accompanied in all her meetings by Mr Netanyahu’s personal representative and has no mandate to make any offers to the Palestinian side without the authorisation of a cabinet committee. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The divisions within the government were on show this week when Ms Livni was quoted by Maariv newspaper saying that Israel would not require a Palestinian recognition of Israel as a Jewish state before substantial negotiations, a pre-condition often mentioned by the previous Netanyahu government. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ms Livni did not confirm or deny the report but senior Likud politicians criticised her and Mr Netanyahu, in his meeting with Mr Kerry, stressed that Israel was interested first in discussing with the Palestinians “questions of recognition and security”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the meeting however, Mr Netanyahu did say that he was “determined not only to resume the peace process with the Palestinians, but to make a serious effort to end this conflict once and for all”. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But by highlighting the  issues of “recognition and security” as a priority, Mr Netanyahu was also rejecting the Palestinian demand that Mr Kerry had heard the previous day in Ramallah — that Israel present a map containing the future borders between it and a Palestinian state as a condition for talks. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With no sign right now of a way to bridge the gap between the two sides, before leaving Israel for a G8 conference in London and in his final media briefing, Mr Kerry was left to dwell on a new economic plan for the PA in the West Bank, which was just about the only thing the two sides agreed upon. Mr Kerry ruefully admitted that all parties “have homework to do”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Mr Kerry is no doubt earnest in his intention to renew talks, there was a sense of dislocation about the talks this week as the main focus both within Israel, around the region and in Washington, was on other matters. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new Israeli government is currently gearing up to face two major domestic challenges: a new state budget, which is expected to deeply slash social spending, and the controversial new national-service law, which is meant to set a legal framework for the drafting of yeshivah students. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, the Israel-Palestine conflict is on the back-burner in the wider Middle East, where the attention is mainly on the ongoing political crisis and violent demonstrations in Egypt and the continuing implosion of civil war-torn Syria.&lt;br /&gt;
Neither is it clear when Mr Kerry will be able to return to Jerusalem and Ramallah, as he will have to direct his attentions towards the threat of war on the Korean peninsula. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/israel-news">Israel news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/palestinians">Palestinians</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/israel">Israel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thejc.com/news/topics/usa-0">USA</category>
 <nid>105304</nid>
 <type>story</type>
 <strap>John Kerry has relaunched the peace process, but Israel and the Palestinians remain as far apart as ever</strap>
 
 <caption>Violent protests erupted in Hebron last week after a Palestinian prisoner died of cancer while in an Israeli jail. Palestinians said he had not been given proper medical care (Photo: AP)</caption>
 <link1>105219</link1>
 <link1_title>Opinion divided over Kerry peace talks visit</link1_title>
 <link2>104933</link2>
 <link2_title>Kerry arrives in Israel to kick-start peace process</link2_title>
 <footer />
 <body>American Secretary of State John Kerry sounded hopeful this week when he tried to relaunch the peace process between the Israelis and Palestinians — but it seems that so far he has only succeeded in highlighting the distance between the two sides and major differences within the Israeli cabinet. 
Mr Kerry, who was on a 48-hour visit to the region earlier this week to Jerusalem and Ramallah, where he held talks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, has been trying to capitalise on US President Barack Obama’s successful visit to Israel three weeks ago. 
In an upbeat address to American diplomatic staff in Jerusalem, he said that while the Israel-Palestine conflict is “the biggest, the longest, the most complicated and the most vexing” of global conflicts, he would not be back for his “multiple-whatever-umpteenth trip” if he did not believe that America could bring the sides together and encourage them to find a peaceful resolution to their disputes.
In the absence of a foreign minister, there is no clear Israeli representative now leading the government’s diplomatic effort. Justice Minister Tzipi Livni has also been appointed to lead negotiations with the Palestinian Authority but she is to be accompanied in all her meetings by Mr Netanyahu’s personal representative and has no mandate to make any offers to the Palestinian side without the authorisation of a cabinet committee. 
The divisions within the government were on show this week when Ms Livni was quoted by Maariv newspaper saying that Israel would not require a Palestinian recognition of Israel as a Jewish state before substantial negotiations, a pre-condition often mentioned by the previous Netanyahu government. 
Ms Livni did not confirm or deny the report but senior Likud politicians criticised her and Mr Netanyahu, in his meeting with Mr Kerry, stressed that Israel was interested first in discussing with the Palestinians “questions of recognition and security”.
In the meeting however, Mr Netanyahu did say that he was “determined not only to resume the peace process with the Palestinians, but to make a serious effort to end this conflict once and for all”. 
But by highlighting the  issues of “recognition and security” as a priority, Mr Netanyahu was also rejecting the Palestinian demand that Mr Kerry had heard the previous day in Ramallah — that Israel present a map containing the future borders between it and a Palestinian state as a condition for talks. 
With no sign right now of a way to bridge the gap between the two sides, before leaving Israel for a G8 conference in London and in his final media briefing, Mr Kerry was left to dwell on a new economic plan for the PA in the West Bank, which was just about the only thing the two sides agreed upon. Mr Kerry ruefully admitted that all parties “have homework to do”.
While Mr Kerry is no doubt earnest in his intention to renew talks, there was a sense of dislocation about the talks this week as the main focus both within Israel, around the region and in Washington, was on other matters. 
The new Israeli government is currently gearing up to face two major domestic challenges: a new state budget, which is expected to deeply slash social spending, and the controversial new national-service law, which is meant to set a legal framework for the drafting of yeshivah students. 
Meanwhile, the Israel-Palestine conflict is on the back-burner in the wider Middle East, where the attention is mainly on the ongoing political crisis and violent demonstrations in Egypt and the continuing implosion of civil war-torn Syria.
Neither is it clear when Mr Kerry will be able to return to Jerusalem and Ramallah, as he will have to direct his attentions towards the threat of war on the Korean peninsula. </body>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:00:22 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anshel Pfeffer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">105304 at http://www.thejc.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
